Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397638›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

The Impact of Higher Than Recommended Gestational Weight Gain on Fetal Growth and Perinatal Risk Factors-The IOM Criteria Reconsidered.

Sylvia Kirchengast, Josef Fellner, Julia Haury, Magdalena Kraus, Antonia Stadler, Teresa Schöllauf, Beda Hartmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond the mirror: Exploring the impact of maternal body image attitudes on gestational weight gain and maternal and neonatal outcomes, a systematic review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvia KirchengastDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3220-7271
Josef FellnerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Julia HauryDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Magdalena KrausDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Antonia StadlerDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Teresa SchöllaufDepartment of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Vienna, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Beda HartmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Clinic Donaustadt, 1030 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3790-0251
University of Vienna · ATDonauspital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A too-high gestational weight gain, in combination with steadily increasing obesity rates among women of reproductive age, represents an enormous obstetrical problem, as obesity and high gestational weight gain are associated with enhanced fetal growth, low vital parameters, and increased cesarean section rates. This medical record-based study investigates the association patterns between too-low as well as too-high gestational weight gain, according to the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines, and fetal growth, as well as birth mode and pregnancy outcome. The data of 11,755 singleton births that had taken place between 2010 and 2020 at the Public Clinic Donaustadt in Vienna, Austria, were analyzed. Birth weight, birth length, head circumference, APGAR scores, and pH values of the arterial umbilical cord blood described fetal growth as well as the vital parameters after birth. Gestational weight gain was classified as too low, recommended, or too high according to the different weight status categories of the IOM guidelines. Birth weight, birth length, and head circumference of the newborn were significantly increased (

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainObesity, MorbidPregnancy ComplicationsBirth WeightBody Mass IndexCesarean SectionFemaleFetal DevelopmentFetal MacrosomiaHumansInfant, NewbornNational Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine, U.S., Health and Medicine DivisionOverweightPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRisk Factorsemergency caesarean sectionexcessive gestational weight gainintrauterine growthnewborn sizeperinatal riskspregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID38397638
PMCPMC10887580
OpenAlexW4391317558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.