Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397625›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Value-Based Healthcare Delivery: A Scoping Review.

Mirian Fernández-Salido, Tamara Alhambra-Borrás, Georgia Casanova, Jorge Garcés-Ferrer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The VBHC big picture: an umbrella review.BMC health services research · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The silver tsunami and the elective arthroplasty crisis: How geriatric trauma overruns public surgical capacity.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  6. Increasing Utilization of Advanced Practice Providers in Spine Surgery from 2013 to 2022: A Medicare Part B Analysis.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Physiotherapist and nurse perspectives on the acceptability and timing of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice: Balancing standardisation and flexibility.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The future of follow-up: technology-enabled medical and developmental follow-up care for NICU graduates.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mirian Fernández-SalidoInstituto de Investigación en Políticas de Bienestar Social (POLIBIENESTAR)-Research Institute on Social Welfare Policy, Universitat de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2017-2139
Tamara Alhambra-BorrásInstituto de Investigación en Políticas de Bienestar Social (POLIBIENESTAR)-Research Institute on Social Welfare Policy, Universitat de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8595-1969
Georgia CasanovaCentre for Socio-Economic Research on Ageing, IRCCS-INRCA National Institute of Health & Science on Ageing, 60124 Ancona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3944-873X
Jorge Garcés-FerrerInstituto de Investigación en Políticas de Bienestar Social (POLIBIENESTAR)-Research Institute on Social Welfare Policy, Universitat de València, 46022 Valencia, Spain.

Funding

European Commission 875215
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare systems are transforming from the traditional volume-based model of healthcare to a value-based model of healthcare. Value generation in healthcare is about emphasising the health outcomes achieved by patients and organisations while maintaining an optimal relationship with costs. This scoping review aimed to identify the key elements and outcomes of implementing value-based healthcare (VBHC). The review process included studies published from 2013 to 2023 in four different databases (SpringerLink, PubMed, ProQuest and Scopus). Of the 2801 articles retrieved from the searches, 12 met the study's inclusion criteria. A total of 11 studies referred to value as the relationship between the outcomes achieved by patients and the costs of achieving those outcomes. Most of the studies highlighted the presence of leadership, the organisation of care into integrated care units, the identification and standardisation of outcome measures that generate value for the patient, and the inclusion of the patient perspective as the most prominent key elements for optimal VBHC implementation. Furthermore, some benefits were identified from VBHC implementation, which could shed light for future implementation actions. Therefore, the VBHC model is a promising approach that may contribute to an improvement in the efficiency and sustainability of healthcare.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareValue-Based Health CareCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansOutcome Assessment, Health Carehealthcarehealth systemsintegrated careolder patientsvalue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID38397625
PMCPMC10888410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.