Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397615›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2024

Celiac Disease: Risks of Cross-Contamination and Strategies for Gluten Removal in Food Environments.

Fabiana Magnabosco de Vargas, Louise Thomé Cardoso, Amanda Didoné, João P M Lima, Janaína Guimarães Venzke, Viviani Ruffo de Oliveira

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabiana Magnabosco de VargasPostgraduate Program in Food, Nutrition, and Health (PPGANS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6524-6904
Louise Thomé CardosoPostgraduate Program in Agricultural and Environmental Microbiology (PPGMAA), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, RS, Brazil.
Amanda DidonéNutrition Deparment, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, RS, Brazil.
João P M LimaScientific-Pedagogical Unit of Dietetics and Nutrition, Coimbra Health School, Polytechnic University of Coimbra, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0157-8368
Janaína Guimarães VenzkeNutrition Deparment, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3990-3912
Viviani Ruffo de OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Food, Nutrition, and Health (PPGANS), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 90035-003, RS, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6029-2525
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRPolytechnic Institute of Coimbra · PT

Funding

Fapergs- Brazil only funding for traslation into English
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Celiac disease (CD) is the chronic immune-mediated enteropathy of the small bowel, manifesting when exposure to gluten occurs in genetically predisposed individuals. Nowadays, the only treatment considered safe for CD is a gluten-free diet (GFD). However, one of the problems faced by celiac patients is the cross-contamination of gluten-free food when preparing meals, in addition to utensils, surfaces and equipment. This study aimed to evaluate cross-contamination in gluten-free products and strategies for removing gluten from cross-contamination in cooking environments. The selection of papers for this integrative review was carried out by searching different databases. Gluten cross-contamination is a global concern for celiac patients in food environments. Although some practices are positive, such as gluten labeling on processed food in several countries, it is crucial to promote good practices in food services around the world. Only a few studies showed effective results in removing gluten from surfaces and utensils; furthermore, sampling was limited, making it difficult to identify appropriate procedures to reduce cross-contamination. The variation in contamination in different kitchen environments also highlighted that celiac patients must continue paying attention to the methods used to prepare gluten-free food. More research is needed, especially into methods of removing gluten from surfaces and utensils, to ensure food safety for celiac patients in many food environments.

Indexed as

Celiac DiseaseGlutensDiet, Gluten-FreeFoodHumansIntestine, SmallGlutensgluten-free dietgluten removal methodsgluten removinggluten residuestreatment

Identifiers

PMID38397615
PMCPMC10888188
OpenAlexW4391173787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.