ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Healthcare: Parental Perceptions and Ethical Implications.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives of Patients Regarding Artificial Intelligence and Its Application in Healthcare: A Qualitative Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Children and adolescents' views on artificial intelligence in pediatric healthcare: a qualitative focus group study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Parents' knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding the use of artificial intelligence in pediatric medicine: a cross-sectional study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Review
- FDA-Regulated AI-Enabled Medical Devices With Pediatric Indications.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Large language models and child mortality: opportunities and challenges in answering public queries on under-5 causes.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Parents' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence-Supported Pediatric Healthcare Services: A Descriptive and Correlational Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Parental and carer views on the use of AI in imaging for children: a national survey.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Parental, Patient, and Provider Perspectives on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Care.Academic pediatrics · 2025Review
- [Artificial intelligence in preventive medicine for children and adolescents-applications and acceptance].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2025Review
- Pediatric nursing in the AI era: from clinical integration to ethical practice to education.Child health nursing research · 2025Article
- Exploring the Acceptance and Opportunities of Using a Specific Generative AI Chatbot to Assist Parents in Managing Pediatric Rheumatological Chronic Health Conditions: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2025Article
- The Impact of Physical Activity on Clinical Outcomes in Children with Cystic Fibrosis: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing precision oncology: the role of artificial intelligence in personalized pediatric cancer care.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Insights into self-reported food allergies in Romanian schoolchildren.Frontiers in allergy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOur study aimed to explore the way artificial intelligence (AI) utilization is perceived in pediatric medicine, examining its acceptance among patients (in this case represented by their adult parents), and identify the challenges it presents in order to understand the factors influencing its adoption in clinical settings.
methodsA structured questionnaire was applied to caregivers (parents or grandparents) of children who presented in tertiary pediatric clinics.
resultsThe most significant differentiations were identified in relation to the level of education (e.g., aversion to AI involvement was 22.2% among those with postgraduate degrees, 43.9% among those with university degrees, and 54.5% among those who only completed high school). The greatest fear among respondents regarding the medical use of AI was related to the possibility of errors occurring (70.1%).
conclusionsThe general attitude toward the use of AI can be considered positive, provided that it remains human-supervised, and that the technology used is explained in detail by the physician. However, there were large differences among groups (mainly defined by education level) in the way AI is perceived and accepted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.