Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397267›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Investigating Facilitators and Barriers for Active Breaks among Secondary School Students: Formative Evaluation of Teachers and Students.

Alice Masini, Giulia Longo, Matteo Ricci, Lawrence M Scheier, Alessandra Sansavini, Andrea Ceciliani, Laura Dallolio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mapping Movement Integration in Secondary Schools: A Scoping Review of Evidence.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alice MasiniDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, 28100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1238-3777
Giulia LongoDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6715-5830
Matteo RicciDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7165-2407
Lawrence M ScheierLARS Research Institute, Inc., Sun City, AZ 85351, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2254-0123
Alessandra SansaviniDepartment of Psychology "Renzo Canestrari", University of Bologna, 40127 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1991-9864
Andrea CecilianiDepartment of Life Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Campus of Rimini, 47921 Rimini, Italy.
Laura DallolioDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7555-9659
University of Bologna · ITLars Research Institute · USUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical activity in the form of "active breaks" can be combined with academic instruction in primary school. However, few studies have examined the feasibility of conducting active breaks in secondary school. To address this gap, we conducted focus groups (FGs) regarding the implementation of an active breaks (ABs) protocol with 20 teachers and 10 secondary school students. Barriers/facilitators toward the implementation of ABs were classified using grounded theory inductive methods framed by the socio-ecological model. Individual-level factors were instrumental for both teachers and students. Teachers highlighted personal fears and concerns regarding using ABs, while students reported fears related to peer behaviour during the activity. Both teachers and students agreed that ABs can improve cognitive skills and time-on-task behaviour. Teachers articulated concerns related to student behaviour during ABs including possible social exclusion and injury. Students felt that ABs might affect classroom management and interfere with maintaining students' academic focus. Teachers underscored that ABs required social support from the administration and colleagues. Students felt that ABs could support teachers' instructional focus and provide them with an energy respite. Collectively, the FGs suggested that environmental limitations could hinder the implementation of ABs. Involving teacher and student feedback during the codesign phase can rationally inform the design of school-based ABs.

Indexed as

adolescentbarriersfacilitatorsfocus groupsgrounded theoryphysical activityteachers

Identifiers

PMID38397267
PMCPMC10887277
OpenAlexW4391215677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.