Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397242›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models.

Haoran Ma, Hongwei Li, Fei Ge, Huqiong Zhao, Bo Zhu, Lupei Zhang, Huijiang Gao, Lingyang Xu, Junya Li, Zezhao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Better Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Tropical Bull Fertility Using a Breed-Adjusted Genomic Relationship Matrix.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Haoran MaInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Hongwei LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Fei GeInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Huqiong ZhaoCollege of Animal Science, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China.
Bo ZhuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Lupei ZhangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7701-2331
Huijiang GaoInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Lingyang XuInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8463-6668
Junya LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.
Zezhao WangInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1224-681X
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNShanxi Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

the Central-level public welfare research institutes basic research business expenses special funds projects 2022-YWF-ZYSQ-02the Central-level public welfare research institutes basic research business expenses special funds projects 2023-YWF-ZX-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that combining populations from similar or closely related genetic breeds improves the accuracy of genomic predictions (GP). Extensive experimentation with diverse Bayesian and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) models have been developed to explore multi-breed genomic selection (GS) in livestock, ultimately establishing them as successful approaches for predicting genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of using BayesR and GBLUP models with linkage disequilibrium (LD)-weighted genomic relationship matrices (GRMs) for genomic prediction in three different beef cattle breeds to identify the best approach for enhancing the accuracy of multi-breed genomic selection in beef cattle. Additionally, a comparison was conducted to evaluate the predictive precision of different marker densities and genetic correlations among the three breeds of beef cattle. The GRM between Yunling cattle (YL) and other breeds demonstrated modest affinity and highlighted a notable genetic concordance of 0.87 between Chinese Wagyu (WG) and Huaxi (HX) cattle. In the within-breed GS, BayesR demonstrated an advantage over GBLUP. The prediction accuracies for HX cattle using the BayesR model were 0.52 with BovineHD BeadChip data (HD) and 0.46 with whole-genome sequencing data (WGS). In comparison to the GBLUP model, the accuracy increased by 26.8% for HD data and 9.5% for WGS data. For WG and YL, BayesR doubled the within-breed prediction accuracy to 14.3% from 7.1%, outperforming GBLUP across both HD and WGS datasets. Moreover, analyzing multiple breeds using genomic selection showed that BayesR consistently outperformed GBLUP in terms of predictive accuracy, especially when using WGS. For instance, in a mixed reference population of HX and WG, BayesR achieved a significant accuracy of 0.53 using WGS for HX, which was a substantial enhancement over the accuracies obtained with GBLUP models. The research further highlights the benefit of including various breeds in the reference group, leading to enhanced accuracy in predictions and emphasizing the importance of comprehensive genomic selection methods. Our research findings indicate that BayesR exhibits superior performance compared to GBLUP in multi-breed genomic prediction accuracy, achieving a maximum improvement of 33.3%, especially in genetically diverse breeds. The improvement can be attributed to the effective utilization of higher single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) marker density by BayesR, resulting in enhanced prediction accuracy. This evidence conclusively demonstrates the significant impact of BayesR on enhancing genomic predictions in diverse cattle populations, underscoring the crucial role of genetic relatedness in selection methodologies. In parallel, subsequent studies should focus on refining GRM and exploring alternative models for GP.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsAnimalsBayes TheoremCattleLinkage DisequilibriumPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBayesRgenomic predictionmulti-breed predictionprediction accuracyweighted G-matrix

Identifiers

PMID38397242
PMCPMC10887749
OpenAlexW4391933109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.