Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38397205›Full record

ArticleGenes2024

Exploring the Impact of Primer-Template Mismatches on PCR Performance of DNA Polymerases Varying in Proofreading Activity.

Ke Huang, Jilei Zhang, Jing Li, Haixiang Qiu, Lanjing Wei, Yi Yang, Chengming Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Veterinary world · 2026
    Article
  6. A Species-SpecificBiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ke HuangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.
Jilei ZhangCollege of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9589-1162
Jing LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.
Haixiang QiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.
Lanjing WeiBioengineering Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA.
Yi YangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225012, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5214-5856
Chengming WangDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7874-8340
Yangzhou University · CNAuburn University · USSongjiang District Central Hospital · CNUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a widely used technique in gene expression analysis, diagnostics, and various molecular biology applications. However, the accuracy and sensitivity of PCR can be compromised by primer-template mismatches, potentially leading to erroneous results. In this study, we strategically designed 111 primer-template combinations with varying numbers, types, and locations of mismatches to meticulously assess their impact on qPCR performance while two distinctly different types of DNA polymerases were used. Notably, when a single-nucleotide mismatch occurred at the 3' end of the primer, we observed significant decreases in the analytical sensitivity (0-4%) with Invitrogen™ Platinum™

Indexed as

DNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA ReplicationDNA PrimersNucleotidesPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA PrimersNucleotidesDNA Polymerasesnucleotide mismatchPCRProofreading

Identifiers

PMID38397205
PMCPMC10888005
OpenAlexW4391601306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.