Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38396440›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

A Software Tool for Estimating Uncertainty of Bayesian Posterior Probability for Disease.

Theodora Chatzimichail, Aristides T Hatjimihail

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A software tool for applying Bayes' theorem in medical diagnostics.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Theodora ChatzimichailHellenic Complex Systems Laboratory, Kostis Palamas 21, 66131 Drama, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-6765-8454
Aristides T HatjimihailHellenic Complex Systems Laboratory, Kostis Palamas 21, 66131 Drama, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-0502-7996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of medical diagnosis is essential in patient care and healthcare. Established diagnostic practices typically rely on predetermined clinical criteria and numerical thresholds. In contrast, Bayesian inference provides an advanced framework that supports diagnosis via in-depth probabilistic analysis. This study's aim is to introduce a software tool dedicated to the quantification of uncertainty in Bayesian diagnosis, a field that has seen minimal exploration to date. The presented tool, a freely available specialized software program, utilizes uncertainty propagation techniques to estimate the sampling, measurement, and combined uncertainty of the posterior probability for disease. It features two primary modules and fifteen submodules, all designed to facilitate the estimation and graphical representation of the standard uncertainty of the posterior probability estimates for diseased and non-diseased population samples, incorporating parameters such as the mean and standard deviation of the test measurand, the size of the samples, and the standard measurement uncertainty inherent in screening and diagnostic tests. Our study showcases the practical application of the program by examining the fasting plasma glucose data sourced from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Parametric distribution models are explored to assess the uncertainty of Bayesian posterior probability for diabetes mellitus, using the oral glucose tolerance test as the reference diagnostic method.

Indexed as

Bayesian diagnosisBayesian inferencecombined uncertaintyconfidence intervalsdiabetes mellitusfasting plasma glucoselikelihoodmeasurement uncertaintyoral glucose tolerance testparametric distributionposterior probabilityprior probabilityprobability density functionsampling uncertaintyuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID38396440
PMCPMC10887534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.