Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38396420›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Indications, Techniques and Future Perspectives of Walled-off Necrosis Management.

Edoardo Troncone, Rosa Amendola, Fabio Gadaleta, Elena De Cristofaro, Benedetto Neri, Pasquale De Vico, Omero Alessandro Paoluzi, Giovanni Monteleone, Andrea Anderloni, Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edoardo TronconeDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Rosa AmendolaDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Fabio GadaletaDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Elena De CristofaroDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Benedetto NeriDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Pasquale De VicoDepartment of Anaesthesia, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.
Omero Alessandro PaoluziDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5393-5796
Giovanni MonteleoneDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1339-9076
Andrea AnderloniEndoscopy Unit, First Department of Internal Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, 27029 Pavia, Italy.
Giovanna Del Vecchio BlancoDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6327-563X
University of Rome Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Pavia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing pancreatitis is a complex clinical condition burdened with significant morbidity and mortality. In recent years, the huge progress of interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has allowed a shift in the management of pancreatic necrotic collections from surgical/percutaneous approaches to mini-invasive endoscopic internal drainage and debridement procedures. The development of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs), devices specifically dedicated to transmural EUS interventions, further prompted the diffusion of such techniques. Several studies have reported excellent outcomes of endoscopic interventions, in terms of technical success, clinical efficacy and safety compared to surgical interventions, and thus endoscopic drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) has become a fundamental tool for the management of such conditions. Despite these advancements, some critical unresolved issues remain. Endoscopic therapeutic approaches to WON are still heterogeneous among different centers and experts. A standardized protocol on indication, timing and technique of endoscopic necrosectomy is still lacking, and experts often adopt a strategy based on personal experience more than robust data from well-conducted studies. In this review, we will summarize the available evidence on endoscopic management of WON and will discuss some unanswered questions in this rapidly evolving field.

Indexed as

EUS drainagenecrotizing pancreatitiswalled-off necrosis

Identifiers

PMID38396420
PMCPMC10888331
OpenAlexW4391683402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.