Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38396390›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Rectal Sensory and Compliance Testing: A Method Comparison Study between High-Resolution Anorectal Manometry and Barostat Investigations.

Lucian Marinica Grando, Jonas Halfvarson, Michiel van Nieuwenhoven

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07705542 (Analysing the Impact of Balloon Inflated vs Balloon Deflated Push Manoeuvres in Chronically Constipated Patients During Biofeedback Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07705542 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Analysing the Impact of Balloon Inflated vs Balloon Deflated Push Manoeuvres in Chronically Constipated Patients During Biofeedback Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHull University Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustRan2026 to 2026Enrolled10ConditionsConstipation, Chronic Constipation, Dyssynergia, AnismusArmsInflating anorectal catheter balloon to defecatory desired volume during push manoeuvres in biofeedback therapy., No intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucian Marinica GrandoDepartment Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE 7082 Örebro, Sweden.
Jonas HalfvarsonDepartment Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE 7082 Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0122-7234
Michiel van NieuwenhovenDepartment Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE 7082 Örebro, Sweden.
Örebro University · SE

Funding

Research Committee Region Örebro County OLL-929762, OLL-935240, OLL-978046Research Fund of the Swedish Gastroenterological Society SLS-974222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal visceral perception and motor function are often observed in patients with fecal incontinence, evacuation disorders and irritable bowel syndrome. The international anorectal physiology working group has proposed a standardization for anorectal function assessment, where rectal sensitivity testing is performed using an elastic balloon attached to a high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) catheter. Rectal compliance, another component of rectal function evaluation, is a pressure-volume relationship that refers to the rectum's ability to stretch and expand as it receives and holds fecal matter. There are no data available regarding the possibility of compliance testing using HRAM, although this is theoretically possible by correcting for the elastic balloon's intrinsic properties. The gold standard for measurement of visceral sensitivity and compliance is the rectal barostat, according to the procedure described by the European COST action GENIEUR group. Data on the agreement between the two different procedures are scarce. Hence, we performed a comparative study of the HRAM and barostat investigations in 26 healthy individuals. We hypothesized that by inflating the balloon before the examination, rectal compliance can be measured with HRAM investigations, and we examined correlations and levels of agreement between the methods. Our results demonstrate that assessing rectal compliance with HRAM is technically possible; however, a strong correlation with the rectal barostat was only observed at the maximum tolerable volume (Spearman's rho = 0.7,

Indexed as

high-resolution anorectal manometryrectal barostatrectal compliancerectal sensory function

Identifiers

PMID38396390
PMCPMC10888286
OpenAlexW4391566538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.