Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38396389›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Comparison of Bone Evaluation and Metal Artifact between Photon-Counting CT and Five Energy-Integrating-Detector CT under Standardized Conditions Using Cadaveric Forearms.

Takeshi Fukuda, Takenori Yonenaga, Ryo Akao, Tohru Hashimoto, Kazuhiro Maeda, Tomokazu Shoji, Shoichi Shioda, Yu Ishizaka, Hiroya Ojiri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Takeshi FukudaDepartment of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7196-1413
Takenori YonenagaDepartment of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Ryo AkaoDepartment of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Tohru HashimotoDepartment of Anatomy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Kazuhiro MaedaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Tomokazu ShojiDepartment of Radiology, Tha Jikei University Katsushika Medical Center, 6-41-2 Aoto, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo 125-8506, Japan.
Shoichi ShiodaDepartment of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.
Yu IshizakaMedicalscanning Tokyo, 3-1-17 Nihonbashi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 103-0027, Japan.
Hiroya OjiriDepartment of Radiology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-8461, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-6299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare the potential of various bone evaluations by considering photon-counting CT (PCCT) and multiple energy-integrating-detector CT (EIDCT), including three dual-energy CT (DECT) scanners with standardized various parameters in both standard resolution (STD) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) modes.

methodsFour cadaveric forearms were scanned using PCCT and five EIDCTs, by applying STD and UHR modes. Visibility of bone architecture, image quality, and a non-displaced fracture were subjectively scored against a reference EIDCT image by using a five-point scale. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were also compared. To assess metal artifacts, a forearm with radial plate fixation was scanned by with and without Tin filter (Sn+ and Sn-), and virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) at 120 keV was created. Regarding Sn+ and VMI, images were only obtained from the technically available scanners. Subjective scores and the areas of streak artifacts were compared.

resultsPCCT demonstrated significantly lower noise (

conclusionsUnder standardized conditions, while PCCT had almost no subjective superiority in visualizing bone structures and fracture line when compared to EIDCTs, it outperformed in quantitative analysis related to image quality, especially in lower noise and higher tissue contrast. When using PCCT to assess cases with metal implants, it may be recommended to use VMIs to minimize the possible tendency for artifact to be pronounced.

Indexed as

boneenergy-integrating detectorfracturemetal artifactphoton-counting detector

Identifiers

PMID38396389
PMCPMC10888094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.