Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38396308›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2024

Long-acting B-2 agonists (LABA) or long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA): which one may be the first option in group A COPD patients?

Onur Turan, Nalan Ogan, Fulsen Bozkus, Nurhan Sarıoğlu, Pakize Ayşe Turan, Celal Satıcı

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Onur TuranChest Diseases Department, Izmir Katip Celebi University, İzmir, Turkey. onurtura@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-0470
Nalan OganChest Diseases Department, Ufuk University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5232-3803
Fulsen BozkusChest Diseases Department, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü Imam University, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-4390
Nurhan SarıoğluChest Diseases Department, Balıkesir University, Balıkesir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5180-9649
Pakize Ayşe TuranChest Diseases Department, Menemen State Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9325-4303
Celal SatıcıChest Diseases Department, İstanbul Gaziosmanpaşa Research and Training Hospital University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5457-9551
Balıkesir University · TRGaziosmanpaşa Taksim Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIzmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TRKahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University · TRSivas State Hospital · TRUfuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLong-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) or beta-2 agonists (LABA) have been recommended for symptom control in group A COPD patients as a first-line bronchodilator treatment in GOLD guidelines. However, there is no mention of priority/superiority between the two treatment options. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of these treatments in this group.

methodsThe study cohort was formed of all subjects from six pulmonology clinics with an initial diagnosis of COPD who were new users of a LAMA or LABA from January 2020 to December 2021. Seventy-six group A COPD patients, in whom LABA or LAMA therapy had been started in the last 1 month as a first-line treatment, were included in our study. Participants were evaluated with spirometry, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), mMRC scale, and St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) for three times (baseline, 6-12

resultsThere were 76 group A COPD patients with LAMA (67.1%) and LABA (32.9%). The number of patients who improved in CAT score at the end of the first year was significantly higher in patients using LAMA than those using LABA (p = 0.022); the improvement at minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in CAT score of LAMA group at 1

conclusionAccording to significant improvements in CAT and SGRQ score, LAMA may be preferred over LABA as a bronchodilator agent in group A COPD patients, especially in emphysema-dominant phenotype.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAgedBronchodilator AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscarinic AgonistsSpirometryTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsMuscarinic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsCOPDGroup ALong-acting beta-2 agonists (LABA)Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA)Treatment

Identifiers

PMID38396308
OpenAlexW4392111558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.