Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38396269›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2024

The Role of the European Medicines Agency in the Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccines and Future Directions in Enhancing Vaccine Safety Globally.

Irina Caplanusi, Agnieszka Szmigiel, Menno van der Elst, Marie Louise Schougaard Christiansen, Steffen Thirstrup, Cosimo Zaccaria, Bénédicte Cappelli, Georgy Genov, Sabine Straus

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Irina Caplanusi *European Medicines Agency, Pharmacovigilance Office, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Irina.Caplanusi@ema.europa.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0694-4469
Agnieszka Szmigiel *European Medicines Agency, Pharmacovigilance Office, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6049-9634
Menno van der ElstMedicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-6151-6419
Marie Louise Schougaard ChristiansenPharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1963-0895
Steffen ThirstrupChief Medical Officer, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-682X
Cosimo ZaccariaEuropean Medicines Agency, Pharmacovigilance Office, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1441-6061
Bénédicte CappelliEuropean Medicines Agency, Pharmacovigilance Office, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5119-6508
Georgy GenovEuropean Medicines Agency, Pharmacovigilance Office, Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5139-3981
Sabine StrausMedicines Evaluation Board, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9266-3312
European Medicines Agency · NLMedicines Evaluation Board · NLDanish Medicines Agency · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European Union (EU) regulatory network was at the forefront of the safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic. An unprecedented number of case reports of suspected adverse reactions after vaccination called for huge efforts for the assessment of this safety information, to ensure that any possible risks were detected and managed as early as possible, while ruling out coincidental but temporally related adverse health outcomes. We describe the role of the European Medicines Agency alongside the EU regulatory network in the safety monitoring of the COVID-19 vaccines, and provide an insight into challenges, particularities and outcomes of the scientific assessment and regulatory decisions in the complex, dynamic international environment of the pandemic. We discuss the flexible procedural tools that were used to ensure an expedited scientific assessment of safety issues, and subsequent updates of the product information (i.e., labelling) when available evidence (e.g., spontaneous reports, findings from observational studies and/or scientific literature) suggested that causal association is at least a reasonable possibility. The safety monitoring was accompanied by enhanced transparency measures, proactive communication, and easy access to information, which played a key role in public reassurance. The pandemic has been a powerful booster for worldwide collaboration, exchange of information and work-sharing. The safety monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines continues, and the lessons learned will be applied in future safety reviews, as well as future health emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesCommunicationCOVID-19 VaccinesEuropean UnionHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID38396269
PMCPMC11018685
OpenAlexW4392095942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.