SynthesisInternational journal of impotence research2024
Global prevalence of erectile dysfunction and its associated risk factors among men with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International journal of impotence research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists on Erectile Function: Friend or Foe?Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Evaluating the Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Erectile Dysfunction in Type 1 Diabetes: A Focus on Reducing Glucose Variability and Inflammation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Various observational studies have examined the prevalence and determinants of erectile dysfunction (ED) in men with type 1 diabetes across different geographical areas. Nevertheless, a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to consolidate the worldwide prevalence and risk factors remains lacking. Hence, the primary study objective was to perform an extensive systematic review and meta-analysis that specifically examined ED prevalence and determinants in men with type 1 diabetes. A thorough exploration was conducted by examining electronic databases, such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The general ED prevalence and a 95% confidence interval (CI) in men with type 1 diabetes were summarized. The relevant risk factors were analyzed by deriving a comprehensive odds ratio (OR) from merging the ORs using fixed- or random-effects models. The sources of heterogeneity were investigated using subgroup analyses and meta-regression. This systematic review and meta-analysis included 19 articles involving 3788 men with type 1 diabetes. The meta-analysis revealed that men with type 1 diabetes had a combined ED prevalence of 42.5% (95% CI: 34.3%-50.8%). This prevalence showed significant heterogeneity (I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.