Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38396157›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Iterative pseudo balancing for stem cell microscopy image classification.

Adam Witmer, Bir Bhanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Adam WitmerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA. awitm001@ucr.edu.
Bir BhanuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.

Funding

IGERT Fellowship in Video Bioinformatics NSF DGE 0903667Tobacco Related Disease Research Program (TRDRP) Pre-doctoral Fellowship Award DT27-0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many critical issues arise when training deep neural networks using limited biological datasets. These include overfitting, exploding/vanishing gradients and other inefficiencies which are exacerbated by class imbalances and can affect the overall accuracy of a model. There is a need to develop semi-supervised models that can reduce the need for large, balanced, manually annotated datasets so that researchers can easily employ neural networks for experimental analysis. In this work, Iterative Pseudo Balancing (IPB) is introduced to classify stem cell microscopy images while performing on the fly dataset balancing using a student-teacher meta-pseudo-label framework. In addition, multi-scale patches of multi-label images are incorporated into the network training to provide previously inaccessible image features with both local and global information for effective and efficient learning. The combination of these inputs is shown to increase the classification accuracy of the proposed deep neural network by 3[Formula: see text] over baseline, which is determined to be statistically significant. This work represents a novel use of pseudo-labeling for data limited settings, which are common in biological image datasets, and highlights the importance of the exhaustive use of available image features for improving performance of semi-supervised networks. The proposed methods can be used to reduce the need for expensive manual dataset annotation and in turn accelerate the pace of scientific research involving non-invasive cellular imaging.

Indexed as

LearningMicroscopyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerProduct LabelingStem CellsSupervised Machine LearningDeep learningPseudo-labelsStem cell microscopy

Identifiers

PMID38396157
PMCPMC10891062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.