ArticleScientific reports2024
Iterative pseudo balancing for stem cell microscopy image classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven nano-enhanced stem cell therapy for neurodegenerative diseases: from rational design to clinical translation.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Iterative pseudo balancing for stem cell microscopy image classification.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many critical issues arise when training deep neural networks using limited biological datasets. These include overfitting, exploding/vanishing gradients and other inefficiencies which are exacerbated by class imbalances and can affect the overall accuracy of a model. There is a need to develop semi-supervised models that can reduce the need for large, balanced, manually annotated datasets so that researchers can easily employ neural networks for experimental analysis. In this work, Iterative Pseudo Balancing (IPB) is introduced to classify stem cell microscopy images while performing on the fly dataset balancing using a student-teacher meta-pseudo-label framework. In addition, multi-scale patches of multi-label images are incorporated into the network training to provide previously inaccessible image features with both local and global information for effective and efficient learning. The combination of these inputs is shown to increase the classification accuracy of the proposed deep neural network by 3[Formula: see text] over baseline, which is determined to be statistically significant. This work represents a novel use of pseudo-labeling for data limited settings, which are common in biological image datasets, and highlights the importance of the exhaustive use of available image features for improving performance of semi-supervised networks. The proposed methods can be used to reduce the need for expensive manual dataset annotation and in turn accelerate the pace of scientific research involving non-invasive cellular imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.