Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38396125›Full record

ArticleGeroScience2024

Exclusion of older patients from randomized clinical trials in Parkinson's disease.

Danuta Kłosowska, Urszula Fiszer, Jarosław Dulski, Andrzej Górski, Jan Borysowski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Clinical trials in late-stage Parkinson's disease.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Danuta KłosowskaDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Nowogrodzka 59, 02-006, Warsaw, Poland.
Urszula FiszerDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Orłowski Hospital, Czerniakowska 231, 00-401, Warsaw, Poland.
Jarosław DulskiDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
Andrzej GórskiBacteriophage Laboratory, Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy, Polish Academy of Sciences (HIIET PAS), Weigla 12, 53-114, Wrocław, Poland.
Jan BorysowskiDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Medical University of Warsaw, Nowogrodzka 59, 02-006, Warsaw, Poland. jan.borysowski@wum.edu.pl.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLCopernicus Memorial Hospital · PLGrochowski Hospital · PLLudwik Hirszfeld Institute of Immunology and Experimental Therapy · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD) increases with age. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the eligibility criteria in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in PD, especially those limiting the enrollment of older adults. We examined RCTs of pharmacological and non-pharmacological anti-parkinsonian interventions registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and started from 2013 through 2022. Primary outcome was proportion of RCTs with an upper age limit of 85 years of age or less. Secondary outcome was proportion of RCTs with other exclusion criteria. Associations between trial characteristics and the presence of the age limits were determined using logistic regression. Our study included 420 RCTs. Two hundred thirty-nine (57%) of these had an upper age limit of 85 years of age or less. Proportion of these trials significantly increased over time. The odds of the presence of an upper age limit were significantly associated with the investigational site location, phase, and timeframe for the primary endpoint assessment. Three hundred fifty-six (85%) trials had other eligibility criteria limiting the enrollment of older patients; these often (n = 285; 68%) included cognitive impairment. Overall, 386 (92%) RCTs either explicitly excluded older adults or had criteria indirectly limiting their enrollment. Underrepresentation of older patients in clinical trials in PD considerably reduces the generalizability of their results. Some eligibility criteria should be modified to enable the investigators to assess the benefits and harms of new therapeutic interventions in older adults. This problem is important in view of rapidly growing number of older patients with PD.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseasePatient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleClinical trialClinicalTrials.govEligibility criteriaRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID38396125
PMCPMC11226414
OpenAlexW4392095027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.