Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38396089›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024

UroPredict: Machine learning model on real-world data for prediction of kidney cancer recurrence (UroCCR-120).

Gaëlle Margue, Loïc Ferrer, Guillaume Etchepare, Pierre Bigot, Karim Bensalah, Arnaud Mejean, Morgan Roupret, Nicolas Doumerc, Alexandre Ingels, Romain Boissier and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Gaëlle MargueBordeaux University Hospital, Urology department, Bordeaux, France. gaelle.margue@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5311-1597
Loïc FerrerSOPHiA GENETICS, Multimodal R&D team, Pessac, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2107-0118
Guillaume EtchepareSOPHiA GENETICS, Multimodal R&D team, Pessac, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9410-0252
Pierre BigotKidney Cancer group of the French Association of Urology Cancer Committee, Paris, France.
Karim BensalahRennes university hospital, Urology department, Rennes, France.
Arnaud MejeanHEGP-APHP, Urology department, Paris, France.
Morgan RoupretKidney Cancer group of the French Association of Urology Cancer Committee, Paris, France.
Nicolas DoumercKidney Cancer group of the French Association of Urology Cancer Committee, Paris, France.
Alexandre IngelsKidney Cancer group of the French Association of Urology Cancer Committee, Paris, France.
Romain BoissierKidney Cancer group of the French Association of Urology Cancer Committee, Paris, France.
Géraldine PignotIPC, Urology department, Marseille, France.
Bastien ParierKremlin-Bicêtre -APHP, Urology department, Paris, France.
Philippe PaparelHCL, Urology department, Lyon, France.
Thibaut WaeckelKidney Cancer group of the French Association of Urology Cancer Committee, Paris, France.
Thierry ColinSOPHiA GENETICS, Multimodal R&D team, Pessac, France.
Jean-Christophe BernhardBordeaux University Hospital, Urology department, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is most often diagnosed at a localized stage, where surgery is the standard of care. Existing prognostic scores provide moderate predictive performance, leading to challenges in establishing follow-up recommendations after surgery and in selecting patients who could benefit from adjuvant therapy. In this study, we developed a model for individual postoperative disease-free survival (DFS) prediction using machine learning (ML) on real-world prospective data. Using the French kidney cancer research network database, UroCCR, we analyzed a cohort of surgically treated RCC patients. Participating sites were randomly assigned to either the training or testing cohort, and several ML models were trained on the training dataset. The predictive performance of the best ML model was then evaluated on the test dataset and compared with the usual risk scores. In total, 3372 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 30 months. The best results in predicting DFS were achieved using Cox PH models that included 24 variables, resulting in an iAUC of 0.81 [IC95% 0.77-0.85]. The ML model surpassed the predictive performance of the most commonly used risk scores while handling incomplete data in predictors. Lastly, patients were stratified into four prognostic groups with good discrimination (iAUC = 0.79 [IC95% 0.74-0.83]). Our study suggests that applying ML to real-world prospective data from patients undergoing surgery for localized or locally advanced RCC can provide accurate individual DFS prediction, outperforming traditional prognostic scores.

Identifiers

PMID38396089
PMCPMC10891119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.