ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024
UroPredict: Machine learning model on real-world data for prediction of kidney cancer recurrence (UroCCR-120).
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Integrative multi-omics analysis identifies SMIM24 as a favorable prognostic biomarker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- A preoperative Artificial Intelligence model to estimate cancer-specific mortality in nonmetastatic kidney cancer patients.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic model integrating preoperative HALP score and lactate dehydrogenase for predicting postoperative recurrence of prostate cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- The Hippo pathway in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): a nexus with the VHL disruption?Translational oncology · 2026Review
- Histology-specific Prognostic Impact of Microscopic Positive Surgical Margins in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Implications for Postoperative Surveillance.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic model for local control prediction in lung cancer patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy: a preliminary study.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Development and temporal validation of a machine learning-based model to predict postoperative recurrence and guide adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- Integrating multi-omics data and machine learning to identify endocrine disrupting chemicals targeting key ccRCC-related genes.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Construction of a prognostic prediction model for colorectal cancer based on 5-year clinical follow-up data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Regression analysis and validation of risk factors for upper limb dysfunction following modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer patients.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Transcriptome-based network analysis related to regulatory T cells infiltration identified RCN1 as a potential biomarker for prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.BioData mining · 2024Article
- External Validation of the GRade, Age, Nodes and Tumor (GRANT) Score for Patients with Surgically Treated Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is most often diagnosed at a localized stage, where surgery is the standard of care. Existing prognostic scores provide moderate predictive performance, leading to challenges in establishing follow-up recommendations after surgery and in selecting patients who could benefit from adjuvant therapy. In this study, we developed a model for individual postoperative disease-free survival (DFS) prediction using machine learning (ML) on real-world prospective data. Using the French kidney cancer research network database, UroCCR, we analyzed a cohort of surgically treated RCC patients. Participating sites were randomly assigned to either the training or testing cohort, and several ML models were trained on the training dataset. The predictive performance of the best ML model was then evaluated on the test dataset and compared with the usual risk scores. In total, 3372 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 30 months. The best results in predicting DFS were achieved using Cox PH models that included 24 variables, resulting in an iAUC of 0.81 [IC95% 0.77-0.85]. The ML model surpassed the predictive performance of the most commonly used risk scores while handling incomplete data in predictors. Lastly, patients were stratified into four prognostic groups with good discrimination (iAUC = 0.79 [IC95% 0.74-0.83]). Our study suggests that applying ML to real-world prospective data from patients undergoing surgery for localized or locally advanced RCC can provide accurate individual DFS prediction, outperforming traditional prognostic scores.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.