ArticleCommunications medicine2024
Multi-scale V-net architecture with deep feature CRF layers for brain extraction.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-scale V-net architecture with deep feature CRF layers for brain extraction.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Target-based deep learning network surveillance of non-contrast computed tomography for small infarct core of acute ischemic stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain extraction is a computational necessity for researchers using brain imaging data. However, the complex structure of the interfaces between the brain, meninges and human skull have not allowed a highly robust solution to emerge. While previous methods have used machine learning with structural and geometric priors in mind, with the development of Deep Learning (DL), there has been an increase in Neural Network based methods. Most proposed DL models focus on improving the training data despite the clear gap between groups in the amount and quality of accessible training data between.
methodsWe propose an architecture we call Efficient V-net with Additional Conditional Random Field Layers (EVAC+). EVAC+ has 3 major characteristics: (1) a smart augmentation strategy that improves training efficiency, (2) a unique way of using a Conditional Random Fields Recurrent Layer that improves accuracy and (3) an additional loss function that fine-tunes the segmentation output. We compare our model to state-of-the-art non-DL and DL methods.
resultsResults show that even with limited training resources, EVAC+ outperforms in most cases, achieving a high and stable Dice Coefficient and Jaccard Index along with a desirable lower Surface (Hausdorff) Distance. More importantly, our approach accurately segmented clinical and pediatric data, despite the fact that the training dataset only contains healthy adults.
conclusionsUltimately, our model provides a reliable way of accurately reducing segmentation errors in complex multi-tissue interfacing areas of the brain. We expect our method, which is publicly available and open-source, to be beneficial to a wide range of researchers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.