ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
A new computer-aided diagnosis tool based on deep learning methods for automatic detection of retinal disorders from OCT images.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEarly detection of retinal disorders using optical coherence tomography (OCT) images can prevent vision loss. Since manual screening can be time-consuming, tedious, and fallible, we present a reliable computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) software based on deep learning. Also, we made efforts to increase the interpretability of the deep learning methods, overcome their vague and black box nature, and also understand their behavior in the diagnosis.
methodsWe propose a novel method to improve the interpretability of the used deep neural network by embedding the rich semantic information of abnormal areas based on the ophthalmologists' interpretations and medical descriptions in the OCT images. Finally, we trained the classification network on a small subset of the online publicly available University of California San Diego (UCSD) dataset with an overall of 29,800 OCT images.
resultsThe experimental results on the 1000 test OCT images show that the proposed method achieves the overall precision, accuracy, sensitivity, and f1-score of 97.6%, 97.6%, 97.6%, and 97.59%, respectively. Also, the heat map images provide a clear region of interest which indicates that the interpretability of the proposed method is increased dramatically.
conclusionThe proposed software can help ophthalmologists in providing a second opinion to make a decision, and primitive automated diagnoses of retinal diseases and even it can be used as a screening tool, in eye clinics. Also, the improvement of the interpretability of the proposed method causes to increase in the model generalization, and therefore, it will work properly on a wide range of other OCT datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.