ArticleScientific reports2024
Normative body mass-adjusted reference ranges of magnetic resonance imaging signs commonly used in diagnosing idiopathic intracranial hypertension in a healthy standard population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interpretation of increased intracranial pressure findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging in headache patients.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- MRI features in atypical idiopathic intracranial hypertension.European radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with chronic daily headaches (CDH) are often a diagnostic challenge and frequently undergo neuroimaging. One common underlying cause of CDH is idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). However, certain neuroimaging abnormalities that suggest IIH, such as optic nerve sheath diameters (ONSD), pituitary gland height, and venous sinus diameter, require interpretation due to the absence of established normative values. Notably, intracranial pressure is known to varies with age, sex and weight, further complicating the determination of objectively abnormal findings within a specific patient group. This study aims to assist clinical neuroradiologists in differentiating neuroimaging results in CDH by providing weight-adjusted normative values for imaging characteristics of IIH. In addition to age and BMI we here assessed 1924 population-based T1-weighted MRI datasets of healthy participants for relevant MRI aspects of IIH. Association to BMI was analyzed using linear/logistic regression controlled for age and stratified for sex. ONSD was 4.3 mm [2.8; 5.9]/4.6 mm [3.6; 5.7] and diameter of transverse sinus was 4.67 mm [1.6; 6.5]/4.45 mm [3.0; 7.9]. Height of pituitary gland was 5.1 mm [2.2;8.1]/4.6 mm [1.9;7.1] for female and male respectively. Values generally varied with BMI with regression slopes spanning 0.0001 to 0.05 and were therefor presented as normative values stratified by BMI. Protrusion of ocular papilla, empty sella and transverse sinus occlusion were rare in total. Our data show an association between BMI and commonly used MRI features for diagnosing IIH. We provide categorized normative BMI values for ONSD, pituitary gland height, and transverse sinus diameter. This distinction helps objectively identify potential IIH indicators compared to regular population norms, enhancing diagnostic accuracy for suspected IIH patients. Notably, optic nerve head protrusion, empty sella, and transverse sinus occlusion are rare in healthy individuals, solidifying their importance as imaging markers regardless of BMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.