ArticleScientific reports2024
Automated vertical cup-to-disc ratio determination from fundus images for glaucoma detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multimodal Prediction of 10-Year Incident Glaucoma Integrating Genetic and Deep Learning-Derived Imaging Features.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- AUBADE-syn: a novel deep learning ensemble method for glaucoma detection using synthetic fundus images on imbalanced datasets.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing Interactive Machine Learning and Unassisted Segmentation of Geographic Atrophy From Fundus Autofluorescence.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- DB-SegNet: optimized framework for glaucoma detection and optic structure segmentation from retinal fundus images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A deep learning model integrating domain-specific features for enhanced glaucoma diagnosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Towards efficient glaucoma screening with modular convolution-involution cascade architecture.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Technology in Glaucoma: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Independent Evaluation of RETFound Foundation Model's Performance on Optic Nerve Analysis Using Fundus Photography.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness worldwide. Often asymptomatic for years, this disease can progress significantly before patients become aware of the loss of visual function. Critical examination of the optic nerve through ophthalmoscopy or using fundus images is a crucial component of glaucoma detection before the onset of vision loss. The vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR) is a key structural indicator for glaucoma, as thinning of the superior and inferior neuroretinal rim is a hallmark of the disease. However, manual assessment of fundus images is both time-consuming and subject to variability based on clinician expertise and interpretation. In this study, we develop a robust and accurate automated system employing deep learning (DL) techniques, specifically the YOLOv7 architecture, for the detection of optic disc and optic cup in fundus images and the subsequent calculation of VCDR. We also address the often-overlooked issue of adapting a DL model, initially trained on a specific population (e.g., European), for VCDR estimation in a different population. Our model was initially trained on ten publicly available datasets and subsequently fine-tuned on the REFUGE dataset, which comprises images collected from Chinese patients. The DL-derived VCDR displayed exceptional accuracy, achieving a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.91 (P = 4.12 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.