ReviewNature protocols2024
Reconstructing phylogenetic trees from genome-wide somatic mutations in clonal samples.
Review in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational approaches for multimodal lineage tracing.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Histiocytosis development and clinical variation through the lens of genomics.The Journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Charting single-cell lineages with synthetic and natural barcodes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Article
- Clinical decisions in clonal hematopoiesis: a contemporary review for clinicians.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Somatic mutations and clonal evolution in normal tissues and cancer development.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Spatial omics and its applications for a tumour microenvironment characterization and precision medicine approach of gastric cancer.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Review
- Reconstructing the lifelong history of cells and tissues via somatic mutation analysis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Review
- Large-scale single-cell phylogenetic mapping of clonal evolution in the human aging esophagus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Modelling the ageing dependence of cancer evolutionary trajectories.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- Mutational landscape of atherosclerotic plaques reveals large clonal cell populations.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Spatially Resolved Tumor Ecosystems and Cell States in Gastric Adenocarcinoma Progression and Evolution.Cancer discovery · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Reconstructing developmental lineages: a retrospective approach using somatic mutations and variant allele frequency.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Common Methods for Phylogenetic Tree Construction and Their Implementation in R.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phylogenetic trees are a powerful means to display the evolutionary history of species, pathogens and, more recently, individual cells of the human body. Whole-genome sequencing of laser capture microdissections or expanded stem cells has allowed the discovery of somatic mutations in clones, which can be used as natural barcodes to reconstruct the developmental history of individual cells. Here we describe Sequoia, our pipeline to reconstruct lineage trees from clones of normal cells. Candidate somatic mutations are called against the human reference genome and filtered to exclude germline mutations and artifactual variants. These filtered somatic mutations form the basis for phylogeny reconstruction using a maximum parsimony framework. Lastly, we use a maximum likelihood framework to explicitly map mutations to branches in the phylogenetic tree. The resulting phylogenies can then serve as a basis for many subsequent analyses, including investigating embryonic development, tissue dynamics in health and disease, and mutational signatures. Sequoia can be readily applied to any clonal somatic mutation dataset, including single-cell DNA sequencing datasets, using the commands and scripts provided. Moreover, Sequoia is highly flexible and can be easily customized. Typically, the runtime of the core script ranges from minutes to an hour for datasets with a moderate number (50,000-150,000) of variants. Competent bioinformatic skills, including in-depth knowledge of the R programming language, are required. A high-performance computing cluster (one that is capable of running mutation-calling algorithms and other aspects of the analysis at scale) is also required, especially if handling large datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38396041What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.