Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38395910›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Experiences of an interprofessional follow-up program in primary care practice.

Beate-Christin Hope Kolltveit, Bjørg Frøysland Oftedal, Sally Thorne, Kirsten Lomborg, Marit Graue

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04076384 (Effectiveness of a Team-based Follow-up Program in General Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04076384 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of a Team-based Follow-up Program in General Practice: Protocol of a Mixed-method Complex Intervention Trial Among People With Chronic Conditions

TypeinterventionalSponsorBergen University CollegeRan2019 to 2022Enrolled228ConditionsDiabetes Type 2, COPDArmsGuided Self-Determination, Standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Beate-Christin Hope KolltveitDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway. bchk@hvl.no.
Bjørg Frøysland OftedalFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Sally ThorneSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CA, Canada.
Kirsten LomborgDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Marit GraueDepartment of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences · NOUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Stavanger · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn integrative cooperation of different healthcare professional is a key component for high quality health services. With an aging population and many with long-term conditions, more health tasks and follow-up care are being transferred to primary care and locally where people live. Interprofessional collaboration among providers of different professional designations will be of increasing importance to optimizing primary care capacity in years to come. There is a call for further exploration of models of interprofessional collaboration that might be applicable in Norwegian primary care. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of interprofessional collaboration between primary care physicians and nurses working in primary care by applying an intervention for people with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, this study was designed to strengthen and gain deeper insight into interprofessional collaboration between primary care physicians and nurses in primary care settings.

methodsWe applied Interpretive Description as a research strategy. The participants within this study were primary care physicians and nurses from four different primary care practices in the western and eastern parts of Norway. We used semi-structured telephone interviews for collecting the data between January and September 2021.

resultsThe analysis revealed two key features of the primary care physicians and the nurses experience with interprofessional collaboration in primary care practices. The first involved managing the influence of discrepancies in their expectations of IPC and the second involved becoming aware of the competence they developed that allowed for better complementarity consultation.

conclusionsThis study indicates that interprofessional collaboration in primary care practice requires that primary care physicians and nurses clarify their expectations and, in turn, determine how flexible they can become in changing their usual primary care practices. Moreover, findings reveal that nurses and primary care physicians had discrepancies in expectations of how interprofessional collaboration should be carried out in primary care practice. However, both the nurses and primary care physicians appreciated the blending of complementary competencies and skills that facilitated a more collaborative care practice. They experienced that this interprofessional collaboration represented an essential quality improvement in the primary care services.

trial registrationThe trial is registered 03/09/2019 in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04076384).

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AgedCooperative BehaviorFollow-Up StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansInterprofessional RelationsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationInterpretive descriptionInterprofessional collaborationPrimary careQualitative

Identifiers

PMID38395910
PMCPMC10885432
OpenAlexW4392106384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.