Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38395903›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2024

Protocol for the ONLOOP trial: pragmatic randomized trial evaluating a province-wide system of personalized reminders for evidence-based surveillance tests in adult survivors of childhood cancer in Ontario.

Jennifer Shuldiner, Emily Lam, Nida Shah, Jeremy Grimshaw, Laura Desveaux, Ruth Heisey, Michael S Taccone, Monica Taljaard, Kednapa Thavorn, David Hodgson and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05832138 (ONLOOP Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05832138 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

ONLOOP Trial: Evaluating a New Surveillance and Support System for Survivors of Childhood Cancer in Ontario

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hospital for Sick ChildrenRan2025 to 2028Enrolled900ConditionsSurvivorship, Cancer, Heart Diseases, Secondary CancerArmsONLOOP program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jennifer ShuldinerWomen's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada. Jennifer.Shuldiner@wchospital.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2240-6274
Emily LamThe Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Nida ShahWomen's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Jeremy GrimshawUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Room 1286, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Laura DesveauxInstitute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, 100 Queensway West, Mississauga, ON, L5B, Canada.
Ruth HeiseyWomen's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Michael S TacconeThe Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Monica TaljaardSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health-University of Ottawa, Clinical Epidemiology-Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornClinical Epidemiology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
David HodgsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Sumit GuptaThe Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Aisha LoftersWomen's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St., Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Noah Ivers *Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville St, Toronto, ON, M5S 1B2, Canada.
Paul C Nathan *The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institute for Health Research Project Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildhood cancer treatment while often curative, leads to elevated risks of morbidity and mortality. Survivors require lifelong periodic surveillance for late effects of treatment, yet adherence to guideline-recommended tests is suboptimal. We created ONLOOP to provide adult survivors of childhood cancer with detailed health information, including summaries of their childhood cancer treatment and recommended surveillance tests for early detection of cardiomyopathy, breast cancer, and/or colorectal cancer, with personalized reminders over time.

methodsThis is an individually randomized, registry-based pragmatic trial with an embedded process and economic evaluation to understand ONLOOP's impact and whether it can be readily implemented at scale. All adult survivors of childhood cancer in Ontario overdue for guideline-recommended tests will be randomly assigned to one of two arms: (1) intervention or (2) delayed intervention. A letter of information and invitation will detail the ONLOOP program. Those who sign up will receive a personalized toolkit and a screening reminder 6 months later. With the participants' consent, ONLOOP will also send their primary care clinician a letter detailing the recommended tests and a reminder 6 months later. The primary outcome will be the proportion of survivors who complete one or more of the guideline-recommended cardiac, breast, or colon surveillance tests during the 12 months after randomization. Data will be obtained from administrative databases. The intent-to-treat principle will be followed. Based on our analyses of administrative data, we anticipate allocating at least 862 individuals to each trial arm, providing 90% power to detect an absolute increase of 6% in targeted surveillance tests completed. We will interview childhood cancer survivors and family physicians in an embedded process evaluation to examine why and how ONLOOP achieved success or failed. A cost-effectiveness evaluation will be performed. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will determine if ONLOOP is effective at helping adult survivors of childhood cancer complete their recommended surveillance tests. This study will also inform ongoing provincial programs for this high-risk population.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05832138.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsAdultChildEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansOntarioPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID38395903
PMCPMC10885391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.