Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38395869›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

PAIN2.0: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 10-week outpatient interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy to manage recurrent pain for patients with risk factors of developing chronic pain in Germany.

Sandra Meyer-Moock, Daniel Szczotkowski, Leonie Schouten, Frank Petzke, Lena Milch, Beatrice Metz-Oster, Louise Zinndorf, Christian Geber, Greta Hoffmann, Anke Preißler and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Cancer-related pain in long-term survivors of oncological diseases: results of a survey on the current care situation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra Meyer-MoockInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. sandra.meyer-moock@med.uni-greifswald.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2607-8880
Daniel SzczotkowskiInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Leonie SchoutenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Frank PetzkeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Lena MilchGerman Red Cross Pain Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Beatrice Metz-OsterGerman Red Cross Pain Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Louise ZinndorfGerman Red Cross Pain Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christian GeberGerman Red Cross Pain Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Greta HoffmannUniversity Pain Centre, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Anke PreißlerUniversity Pain Centre, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Ursula MarschallBARMER, Wuppertal, Germany.
Felix RottkeGerman Pain Society, Berlin, Germany.
Anja WaidnerGerman Pain Society, Berlin, Germany.
André MöllerGerman Pain Society, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas IsenbergGerman Pain Society, Berlin, Germany.
Gabriele LindenaCLARA Klinische Und Versorgungsforschung, Kleinmachnow, Germany.
Anne GärtnerUniversity Pain Centre, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany.
Ulrike KaiserUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein/Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas KohlmannInstitute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
German Cancer Society · DEGerman Red Cross · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEBARMER GEK · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss 01NVF20023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to 27% of the German population suffers from recurrent or persistent pain (lasting more than three months). Therefore, prevention of chronic pain is one major object of pain management interventions. The aim of this nationwide, multicentre, randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a 10-week ambulatory (outpatient) interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (A-IMPT) for patients with recurrent pain and at risk of developing chronic pain. This project was initiated by the German Pain Society (Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e.V.) and the public health insurance provider BARMER. It is currently funded by the German Innovation Fund (01NVF20023). The study PAIN2.0 focuses on reducing pain intensity and pain-related disability and investigates whether this intervention can improve physical activity, psychological well-being, and health literacy.

methodsPAIN2.0 is designed as a multicentre 1:1 randomised controlled trial with two parallel groups (randomisation at the patient level, planned N = 1094, duration of study participation 12 months, implemented by 22 health care facilities nationwide). After 6 months, patients within the control group also receive the intervention. The primary outcomes are pain intensity and pain-related impairment, measured as Characteristic Pain Intensity (PI) and Disability Score (DS) (Von Korff), as well as patient-related satisfaction with the intervention. Secondary outcomes are the number of sick leave days, sickness allowance, treatment costs, psychological distress, health-related quality of life, and catastrophizing. The effects of the intervention will be analysed by a parallel-group comparison between the intervention and control groups. In addition, the long-term effects within the intervention group will be observed and a pre-post comparison of the control group before and after the intervention will be performed. DISCUSSION: Recurrent or persistent pain is common in the German population and causes high costs for patients and society. The A-IMPT aims to improve pain and pain-related impairments in pain patients at risk of chronification, thereby reducing the risk of developing chronic pain with its high socioeconomic burden. This new therapy could easily be integrated into existing therapy programs if positively evaluated.

trial registrationThe trial PAIN2.0 has been registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) since 21/11/2022 with the ID DRKS00030773 .

Indexed as

Chronic PainCost-Benefit AnalysisExerciseHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOutpatientsQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsComplex interventionHealth-related quality of lifeMixed models for repeated measuresMultimodal interdisciplinary pain managementOutpatient group therapyPain and risk factorsPublic healthRandomised controlled trialRecurrent painSecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID38395869
PMCPMC10893721
OpenAlexW4392099310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.