Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38395860›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2024

Partially divided caging reduces overall aggression and anxiety which may indicate improved welfare in group housed male C57BL/6J mice.

Bret R Tallent, L Matthew Law, Jonathan Lifshitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bret R TallentNeurotrauma and Social Impact research team, Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, BSPB Building, 475 N. 5th Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA. btallent@arizona.edu.
L Matthew LawNeurotrauma and Social Impact research team, Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, BSPB Building, 475 N. 5th Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.
Jonathan LifshitzNeurotrauma and Social Impact research team, Department of Psychiatry, University of Arizona College of Medicine - Phoenix, BSPB Building, 475 N. 5th Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85004, USA.

Funding

Animal Welfare Institute NACenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciding which environmental enrichment is used in mouse caging is often subjective, with cost frequently prevailing over welfare benefits, including aggression and anxiety. While many devices introduced to encourage natural behaviors and reduce aggression show mixed results, we have previously demonstrated significant reductions in aggressive behavior between group-housed male mice housed in partially divided caging. To further assess behavior, we have raised male C57BL/6J mice in either partially divided caging or in standard caging with no divider. Animal behavior was tested on rotarod, open field, novel object recognition, elevated plus maze, and Y maze. Body weights were taken weekly beginning at weaning and bite wounds were counted weekly beginning at 133 days old. Aggressive behavior was recorded weekly beginning at 133 days old. Results indicated significantly less anxiety in the elevated-plus maze, statistically fewer bite wounds, and a statistically significant decrease in aggressive behaviors of mice in partially divided caging compared to mice in standard cages. We conclude that reductions in anxiety, aggressive behavior, and bite wounds may indicate improved overall welfare for non-sibling, group housed male mice.

Indexed as

AggressionHousing, AnimalAnimalsAnxietyBehavior, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLAggressionAnxietyFightingMouseWelfare

Identifiers

PMID38395860
PMCPMC10893711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.