Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38395774›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Complex interplay of science reasoning and vaccine hesitancy among parents in Shanghai, China.

Felicia Zhang, Jia Ren, Colin Garon, Zhuoying Huang, John Kubale, Abram L Wagner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Felicia ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jia RenDepartment of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 200336, Shanghai, China.
Colin GaronDepartment of Anthropology, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Zhuoying HuangDepartment of Immunization Program, Shanghai Municipal Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, 200336, Shanghai, China.
John KubaleInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abram L WagnerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. awag@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USShanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CN

Funding

Characterizing parental beliefs to support optimization of vaccine introductionK01AI137123 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WAGNER, ABRAM LUTHER · 2019 to 2023
$475k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI137123NIH HHS K01AI137123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The psychosocial underpinnings of vaccine hesitancy are complex. Research is needed to pinpoint the exact reasons why people hesitate to vaccinate themselves or their children against vaccine-preventable diseases. One possible reason are concerns that arise from a misunderstanding of vaccine science. We examined the impact of scientific reasoning on vaccine hesitancy and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination intent through a cross-sectional study of parents of vaccine-eligible children (N = 399) at immunization clinics in Shanghai, China. We assessed the relationship between science reasoning and both vaccine hesitancy and HPV vaccine acceptance using general additive models. We found a significant association between scientific reasoning and education level, with those with less than a high school education having a significantly lower scientific reasoning that those with a college education (ß = -1.31, p-value = 0.002). However, there was little evidence of a relationship between scientific reasoning and vaccine hesitancy. Scientific reasoning therefore appears not to exert primary influence on the formation of vaccine attitudes among the respondents surveyed. We suggest that research on vaccine hesitancy continues working to identify the styles of reasoning parents engage in when determining whether or not to vaccinate their children. This research could inform the development and implementation of tailored vaccination campaigns.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesChildChinaCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationVaccination HesitancyPapillomavirus VaccinesChinaPapillomavirus vaccinesScience literacySurveys and questionnairesVaccination

Identifiers

PMID38395774
PMCPMC10893659
OpenAlexW4392124989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.