ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024
Comparative study of ultrasound attenuation analysis and controlled attenuation parameter in the diagnosis and grading of liver steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver fibrosis risk: a silent threat in type 1 diabetes mellitus.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- A TyG-UHR-based machine learning model for screening lean MAFLD: development and external validation.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Discordance Between Conventional Ultrasound and Transient Elastography in Hepatic Steatosis Assessment: Clinical Factors Associated with Discrepant Findings.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AI-driven diagnostic and prognostic models for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: insights from clinical, imaging, and multi-omics studies-a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Integrated model based on ultrasound attenuation and metabolic biomarkers for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fat fraction categories in MASLD: a QCT-referenced study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Clinical and biochemical phenotypes of Lean MAFLD: machine learning-based biomarker identification and statistical association analysis in a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Advances in quantitative ultrasound for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease diagnosis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Correlation between ultrasound-based hepatic steatosis grade and thyroid hormone levels.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Efficacy analysis of serum ferritin, Hcy, CRP combined with fat ultrasound parameters in predicting metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: pathophysiological links, epidemiological trends, and clinical implications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Assessment of Tail-Cutting in Frozen Albacore (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
- Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Hepatitis B Virus-associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with and without Cirrhosis.Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the diagnostic performance of Ultrasound Attenuation Analysis (USAT) in the diagnosis and grading of hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) using Controlled Attenuation Parameters (CAP) as a reference. MATERIALS AND
methodsFrom February 13, 2023, to September 26, 2023, participants underwent CAP and USAT examinations on the same day. We used manufacturer-recommended CAP thresholds to categorize the stages of hepatic steatosis: stage 1 (mild) - 240 dB/m, stage 2 (moderate) - 265 dB/m, stage 3 (severe) - 295 dB/m. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were employed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of USAT and determine the thresholds for different levels of hepatic steatosis.
resultsUsing CAP as the reference, we observed that the average USAT value increased with the severity of hepatic steatosis, and the differences in USAT values among the different hepatic steatosis groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between USAT and CAP (r = 0.674, p < 0.0001). When using CAP as the reference, the optimal cut-off values for diagnosing and predicting different levels of hepatic steatosis with USAT were as follows: the cut-off value for excluding the presence of hepatic steatosis was 0.54 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.96); for mild hepatic steatosis, it was 0.59 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.86); for moderate hepatic steatosis, it was 0.73 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.81); and for severe hepatic steatosis, it was 0.87 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.87).
conclusionUSAT exhibits strong diagnostic performance for hepatic steatosis and shows a high correlation with CAP values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.