Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38395765›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2024

Comparative study of ultrasound attenuation analysis and controlled attenuation parameter in the diagnosis and grading of liver steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease patients.

Mengyun Wang, Shuzhen Tang, Guoqiu Li, Zhibin Huang, Sijie Mo, Keen Yang, Jing Chen, Baishan Du, Jinfeng Xu, Zhimin Ding and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Liver fibrosis risk: a silent threat in type 1 diabetes mellitus.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Assessment of Tail-Cutting in Frozen Albacore (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mengyun Wang *The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuzhen Tang *The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Guoqiu LiThe Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhibin HuangThe Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Sijie MoThe Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Keen YangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
Baishan DuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China.
Jinfeng XuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China. xujinfeng@yahoo.com.
Zhimin DingDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China. jimding03@126.com.
Fajin DongDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Shenzhen, China. dongfajin@szhospital.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the diagnostic performance of Ultrasound Attenuation Analysis (USAT) in the diagnosis and grading of hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) using Controlled Attenuation Parameters (CAP) as a reference. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom February 13, 2023, to September 26, 2023, participants underwent CAP and USAT examinations on the same day. We used manufacturer-recommended CAP thresholds to categorize the stages of hepatic steatosis: stage 1 (mild) - 240 dB/m, stage 2 (moderate) - 265 dB/m, stage 3 (severe) - 295 dB/m. Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were employed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of USAT and determine the thresholds for different levels of hepatic steatosis.

resultsUsing CAP as the reference, we observed that the average USAT value increased with the severity of hepatic steatosis, and the differences in USAT values among the different hepatic steatosis groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between USAT and CAP (r = 0.674, p < 0.0001). When using CAP as the reference, the optimal cut-off values for diagnosing and predicting different levels of hepatic steatosis with USAT were as follows: the cut-off value for excluding the presence of hepatic steatosis was 0.54 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.96); for mild hepatic steatosis, it was 0.59 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.86); for moderate hepatic steatosis, it was 0.73 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.81); and for severe hepatic steatosis, it was 0.87 dB/cm/MHz (AUC 0.87).

conclusionUSAT exhibits strong diagnostic performance for hepatic steatosis and shows a high correlation with CAP values.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseBiopsyHumansLiverROC CurveControlled attenuation parametersHepatic steatosisNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseUltrasound attenuation analysis

Identifiers

PMID38395765
PMCPMC10885558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.