SynthesisThe Lancet. Digital health2024
Characterisation of digital therapeutic clinical trials: a systematic review with natural language processing.
Synthesis in The Lancet. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital Therapeutics in China: Comprehensive Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Digital diagnostics, biomarkers and therapeutics in an evolving healthcare system: From promise to practice.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Review
- The Double-Edged Role of Social Media in Modern Healthcare: Awareness, Impact, and Misinformation.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026Review
- Mapping the evidence supporting FDA-authorized digital therapeutics, before and after authorization.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- A dataset of digital therapeutic device approvals to support regulatory decisions and industry research.Scientific data · 2026Article
- The Effectiveness of Digital Therapeutics Intervention in Oral Anticoagulation Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- A Systematic Review of Topic Modeling Techniques for Electronic Health Records.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Italian landscape of digital therapeutics in a European context.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Stakeholder Perspectives on Early Feasibility Studies for Digital Health Technologies in the European Union: Qualitative Interview Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Understanding Economic Decision-Making in Digital Therapeutics Development: Qualitative Approach.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Assessment of digital therapeutics in decentralized clinical trials: A scoping review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Decoding FDA Labeling of Prescription Digital Therapeutics: A Cross-Sectional Regulatory Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- A group concept mapping study of stakeholder perspectives on digital therapeutics economic value drivers.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Assessment of priorities, quality, and inclusivity of digital therapeutics trials in China.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Bridging the Gap: How Accounting for Social Determinants of Health Can Improve Digital Health Equity in Cardiovascular Medicine.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Mapping the Evidence Supporting Digital Therapeutics: A Review.JAMA internal medicine · 2024Article
- Comparison of Product Features and Clinical Trial Designs for the DTx Products with the Indication of Insomnia Authorized by Regulatory Authorities.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Digital therapeutics (DTx) are a somewhat novel class of US Food and Drug Administration-regulated software that help patients prevent, manage, or treat disease. Here, we use natural language processing to characterise registered DTx clinical trials and provide insights into the clinical development landscape for these novel therapeutics. We identified 449 DTx clinical trials, initiated or expected to be initiated between 2010 and 2030, from ClinicalTrials.gov using 27 search terms, and available data were analysed, including trial durations, locations, MeSH categories, enrolment, and sponsor types. Topic modelling of eligibility criteria, done with BERTopic, showed that DTx trials frequently exclude patients on the basis of age, comorbidities, pregnancy, language barriers, and digital determinants of health, including smartphone or data plan access. Our comprehensive overview of the DTx development landscape highlights challenges in designing inclusive DTx clinical trials and presents opportunities for clinicians and researchers to address these challenges. Finally, we provide an interactive dashboard for readers to conduct their own analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.