SynthesisBMJ open respiratory research2024
Association of non-obstructive dyspnoea with all-cause mortality and incident chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ open respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundControversy exists regarding the association between non-obstructive dyspnoea and the future development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and mortality. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association of non-obstructive dyspnoea with mortality and incident COPD in adults.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies published from inception to 13 May 2023. Eligibility screening, data extraction, and quality assessment of the retrieved articles were conducted independently by two reviewers. Studies were included if they were original articles comparing incident COPD and all-cause mortality between individuals with normal lung function with and without dyspnoea. The primary outcomes were incident COPD and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was respiratory disease-related mortality. We used the random-effects model to calculate pooled estimates and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was determined using the I² statistic.
resultsOf 6486 studies, 8 studies involving 100 758 individuals fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study. Compared with individuals without non-obstructive dyspnoea, individuals with non-obstructive dyspnoea had an increased risk of incident COPD (relative risk: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.83), and moderate heterogeneity was found (p=0.079, I
conclusionsIndividuals with non-obstructive dyspnoea are at a higher risk of incident COPD and all-cause mortality than individuals without dyspnoea. Further research should investigate whether these high-risk adults may benefit from risk management and early therapeutic intervention. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023395192.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.