ArticleRMD open2024
Exploring the influence of baseline rheumatoid factor levels on TNF inhibitor retention rate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicentre and retrospective study.
Article in RMD open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors associated with discontinuation of bDMARDs and JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a retrospective study.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Observational
- Efficacy and Safety of Biologic and Targeted Synthetic DMARDs in Young-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effectiveness and retention of certolizumab pegol and JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter retrospective study stratified by rheumatoid factor status.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Influence of Rheumatoid Factors on the Efficacy of TNF Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Poor prognostic factors and unmet needs in rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Rheumatoid factors revisited in the age of biologic therapy.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- What is rheumatoid factor? From screening to personalized management.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Rheumatoid Factor: Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance and Therapeutic Implications in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- High-Titer Rheumatoid Factor is Associated with Worse Clinical Outcomes and Higher Needs for Advanced Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis Under Real-Life Conditions.Rheumatology and therapy · 2025Article
- Influence of rheumatoid factor levels and TNF inhibitor structure on secondary nonresponse in rheumatoid arthritis patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess whether the retention rate of certolizumab pegol (CZP) was longer than that of other tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) based on baseline rheumatoid factor (RF) levels.
methodsLongitudinal, retrospective and multicentre study including patients with RA who were treated with any TNFi (monoclonal antibodies (mAB), etanercept (ETA) or CZP). Log-rank test and Cox regressions were conducted to evaluate the retention rate in the three groups according to the level of RF, with the third quartile of the baseline levels used as cut-off: <200 (<Q3) and ≥200 (≥Q3) IU/mL. A sensitivity analysis matching patients using a propensity score technique based on age, concomitant use of methotrexate and previous targeted synthetic/biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs was performed to address the imbalance across groups.
resultsA total of 638 individuals and 752 treatments (132 CZP, 439 mAB and 181 ETA) were included. In non-naïve patients with ≥200 IU/mL of RF, those treated with CZP showed a significantly longer retention rate in comparison with mAB and ETA. After matching using the propensity score, patients with ≥200 IU/mL RF levels exhibited longer retention rates with CZP than with mAB (HR 2.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 4.3), or ETA (HR 2.8 (95% CI 1.5 to 5.2). No differences were found between groups in patients with <200 UI/mL.
conclusionsCZP showed a longer retention rate than mAB and ETA in patients with very high RF levels (≥200 IU/mL), while these differences were absent in patients with <200 IU/mL levels. The results suggest the potential effect of RF on binding the fragment crystallisable portion of certain TNFi.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.