Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38395256›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in insect science2024

Circadian and daily rhythms of disease vector mosquitoes.

Giles E Duffield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in insect science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. High-resolution characterisation of diel activity rhythms inCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Time to start taking time seriously: how to investigate unexpected biological rhythms within infectious disease research.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Giles E DuffieldDepartment of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, Galvin Life Science Center, University of Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA. Electronic address: duffield.2@nd.edu.

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUM1TR004402 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Sharon M Moe, Sarah Elizabeth Wiehe · 2023 to 2026
$21.6M
Function of Inhibitor of DNA binding (id) genes in the circadian systemR01GM087508 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI DUFFIELD, GILES · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004402NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquitoes express a rich repertoire of daily 24-hour rhythms in biochemistry, physiology, and behavior. The nocturnal Anopheles and Culex and diurnal Aedes mosquitoes are major vectors of human disease, transmitting parasites and arboviruses, such as malaria and dengue. In this review, we explore the role that 24-hour diel and circadian rhythms play in shaping the temporal life of the mosquito. We focus on recent advances in our understanding of behavioral rhythms, focusing on locomotor/flight activity, host-seeking, biting/blood feeding, and mating. We examine the molecular circadian clock, photocycle, and light signals, which in combination shape the mosquito 24-hour temporal program. We address species- and sex-specific differences and highlight important selective pressures from dynamically changing environments. This work also provides new insights into disease transmission, insect control, and future experimental design.

Indexed as

Circadian RhythmMosquito VectorsAnimalsCulicidaeFeeding Behavior

Identifiers

PMID38395256
PMCPMC11708107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.