Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38394788›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2024

A homogenized two-phase computational framework for meso- and macroscale blood flow simulations.

Abhishek Karmakar, Greg W Burgreen, Grant Rydquist, James F Antaki

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Band pattern formation of erythrocytes in density gradients is due to competing aggregation and net buoyancy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abhishek KarmakarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Greg W BurgreenCenter for Advanced Vehicular Systems, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS, USA.
Grant RydquistDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
James F AntakiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. Electronic address: antaki@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USMississippi State University · US

Funding

Multiscale Model of Thrombosis in Artificial CirculationR01HL089456 · NHLBI · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ANTAKI, JAMES F., BUTCHER, JONATHAN TALBOT · 2009 to 2024
$8.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveOwing to the complexity of physics linked with blood flow and its associated phenomena, appropriate modeling of the multi-constituent rheology of blood is of primary importance. To this effect, various kinds of computational fluid dynamic models have been developed, each with merits and limitations. However, when additional physics like thrombosis and embolization is included within the framework of these models, computationally efficient scalable translation becomes very difficult. Therefore, this paper presents a homogenized two-phase blood flow framework with similar characteristics to a single fluid model but retains the flow resolution of a classical two-fluid model. The presented framework is validated against four different sets of experiments.

methodsThe two-phase model of blood presented here is based on the classical diffusion-flux framework. Diffusion flux models are known to be less computationally expensive than two-fluid multiphase models since the numerical implementation resembles single-phase flow models. Diffusion flux models typically use empirical slip velocity correlations to resolve the motion between phases. However, such correlations do not exist for blood. Therefore, a modified slip velocity equation is proposed, derived rigorously from the two-fluid governing equations. An additional drag law for red blood cells (RBCs) as a function of volume fraction is evaluated using a previously published cell-resolved solver. A new hematocrit-dependent expression for lift force on RBCs is proposed. The final governing equations are discretized and solved using the open-source software OpenFOAM.

resultsThe framework is validated against four sets of experiments: (i) flow through a rectangular microchannel to validate RBC velocity profiles against experimental measurements and compare computed hematocrit distributions against previously reported simulation results (ii) flow through a sudden expansion microchannel for comparing experimentally obtained contours of hematocrit distributions and normalized cell-free region length obtained at different flowrates and inlet hematocrits, (iii) flow through two hyperbolic channels to evaluate model predictions of cell-free layer thickness, and (iv) flow through a microchannel that mimics crevices of a left ventricular assist device to predict hematocrit distributions observed experimentally. The simulation results exhibit good agreement with the results of all four experiments.

conclusionThe computational framework presented in this paper has the advantage of resolving the multiscale physics of blood flow while still leveraging numerical techniques used for solving single-phase flows. Therefore, it becomes an excellent candidate for addressing more complicated problems related to blood flow, such as modeling mechanical entrapment of RBCs within blood clots, predicting thrombus composition, and visualizing clot embolization.

Indexed as

ErythrocytesHemodynamicsBlood Flow VelocityComputer SimulationHematocritModels, CardiovascularHemodynamicsHemorheologySlip velocityTwo-phase flow

Identifiers

PMID38394788
PMCPMC11018323
OpenAlexW4391888338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.