Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38394616›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2024

Baseline Toxicity Model to Identify the Specific and Nonspecific Effects of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances in Cell-Based Bioassays.

Weiping Qin, Luise Henneberger, Juliane Glüge, Maria König, Beate I Escher

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing Modes of Toxic Action of Organic Cations inChemical research in toxicology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Weiping QinDepartment of Cell Toxicology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig 04318, Germany.
Luise HennebergerDepartment of Cell Toxicology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig 04318, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3181-0044
Juliane GlügeDepartment of Cell Toxicology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig 04318, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1997-2750
Maria KönigDepartment of Cell Toxicology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig 04318, Germany.
Beate I EscherDepartment of Cell Toxicology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig 04318, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5304-706X
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput screening is a strategy to identify potential adverse outcome pathways (AOP) for thousands of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) if the specific effects can be distinguished from nonspecific effects. We hypothesize that baseline toxicity may serve as a reference to determine the specificity of the cell responses. Baseline toxicity is the minimum (cyto)toxicity caused by the accumulation of chemicals in cell membranes, which disturbs their structure and function. A mass balance model linking the critical membrane concentration for baseline toxicity to nominal (i.e., dosed) concentrations of PFAS in cell-based bioassays yielded separate baseline toxicity prediction models for anionic and neutral PFAS, which were based on liposome-water distribution ratios as the sole model descriptors. The specificity of cell responses to 30 PFAS on six target effects (activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma, aryl hydrocarbon receptor, oxidative stress response, and neurotoxicity in own experiments, and literature data for activation of several PPARs and the estrogen receptor) were assessed by comparing effective concentrations to predicted baseline toxic concentrations. HFPO-DA, HFPO-DA-AS, and PFMOAA showed high specificity on PPARs, which provides information on key events in AOPs relevant to PFAS. However, PFAS were of low specificity in the other experimentally evaluated assays and others from the literature. Even if PFAS are not highly specific for certain defined targets but disturb many toxicity pathways with low potency, such effects are toxicologically relevant, especially for hydrophobic PFAS and because PFAS are highly persistent and cause chronic effects. This implicates a heightened need for the risk assessment of PFAS mixtures because nonspecific effects behave concentration-additive in mixtures.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsFluorocarbonsBiological AssayPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsPropionatesAlkanesulfonic Acidsammonium 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)-propanoateFluorocarbonsPeroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsPropionatesliposome-water distribution ratiomembrane concentrationperoxisome proliferator-activated receptorsPFASpotential adverse outcome pathways

Identifiers

PMID38394616
PMCPMC10993398
OpenAlexW4392093662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.