Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38394611›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

International collaboration between low-middle-income and high-income institutions to improve radiation therapy care delivery.

Diana Ng, Tatiana De Martin, Po Ting Wu, Peter Huang, Jennifer Davis, Jamil Serdiña, Jamie Nash, Sarah Knighton, Sherwin Cala, Tisha Lee V Eduave and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Diana NgGenesisCare Solutions, Alexandria, Australia.
Tatiana De MartinGenesisCare Solutions, Alexandria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1280-3682
Po Ting WuGenesisCare Solutions, Alexandria, Australia.
Peter HuangGenesisCare Solutions, Alexandria, Australia.
Jennifer DavisGenesisCare Solutions, Alexandria, Australia.
Jamil SerdiñaPhilippine Oncology Center Corporation, Quezon City, Philippines.
Jamie NashGenesisCare Solutions, Alexandria, Australia.
Sarah KnightonGenesisCare Solutions, Alexandria, Australia.
Sherwin CalaPhilippine Oncology Center Corporation, Quezon City, Philippines.
Tisha Lee V EduavePhilippine Oncology Center Corporation, Quezon City, Philippines.
Anthony Albert AbadPhilippine Oncology Center Corporation, Quezon City, Philippines.
Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society · AUPhilippine Heart Center · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe Philippines is a lower-middle-income island country with over 153 000 new cancer diagnosis each year. Despite many patients needing radiotherapy as part of disease management, there remains limitations to access. Currently, the Philippines has 50 linear accelerator facilities serving a population of 110 million. However, given the recommendation of 1 linear accelerator for every 250 thousand people, it is evident that the demand for accessible radiotherapy resources is significantly underserved in the country. This paper outlines the collaboration between GenesisCare Solutions (GCS) and Fairview Cancer Center (FCC) to address efficiency and access within the radiotherapy department at FCC.

methodsThrough international collaboration between GCS and FCC, areas for improvement were identified and categorized into four domains: Dosimetry quality, Patient workflow, Data & Reporting, and Information Technology (IT) Infrastructure. Action plans were developed then implemented. A baseline measurement was obtained for each domain, and post-implementation evaluation undertaken at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Data captured within the electronic medical record system was extrapolated, and average treatment times were established for pre- and post-engagement. A paired, 2-tailed t-test was used for statistical analysis of outcome parameters using IBM SPSS version 23 for all statistics.

resultsTwelve months post-initial engagement, all four domains saw positive outcomes. Improved plan quality linked to Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) utilization rates saw an increase from 20% to 54%. A significant reduction in patient average wait times was also observed, from 27 to 17 min (p ≤ 0.001). Prior to engagement, tracking patient demographics and diagnosis was not prioritized, post engagement an average of 92% diagnosis entry compliance was achieved.

conclusionThrough the collaboration of GCS and FCC, objectives in all action plan domains were achieved, highlighting the benefits of collaboration between low-middle-income and high-income institutions.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansRadiometryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedlow-middle income institutionsradiation therapyradiotherapy infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID38394611
PMCPMC10929985
OpenAlexW4392092772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.