Observational studyBlood advances2024
Thrombotic events associated with low baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study.
Observational study in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03803579 (Baseline DOAC Measurement in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients and Incidence of Bleeding or Thromboembolic Complications During Follow-up), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Baseline DOAC Measurement in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients and Incidence of Bleeding or Thromboembolic Complications During Follow-up: a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study. The MAS (Measure And See) Study
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessing the efficacy of a single-cycle measurement and adjustment strategy for direct oral anticoagulants in frail older patients: rationale and design of the DOAC-FRAIL randomized controlled trial.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Implementing anticoagulation stewardship: the use of a dedicated mobile phone 'app' in the experience of the Italian Federation of Anticoagulation linics (FCSA).Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Outcomes of non-valvular atrial fibrillation elderly patients maintained on VKAs' treatment compared to patients switched to DOACs: results from the STARTInternal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Direct Oral Anticoagulant Levels at Time of Elective Surgery.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of a DOAC Urine Dipstick in Obese Outpatients with Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison with Plasma Concentrations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Relevance and limitations of clinical follow-up in a pharmacokinetic study on direct oral anticoagulants.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Direct oral anticoagulants as secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria: an Italian monocentric experience.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Article
- Fibrinography and thrombography (thrombodynamics-4D) in atrial fibrillation assessment of direct oral anticoagulants in geriatrics patients aged 80 years and older receiving direct oral anticoagulant therapy.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Plasma Concentrations of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation and Different Degrees of Obesity.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2025Observational
- Direct oral anticoagulants measurement: when is it necessary?Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2025Article
- Is Laboratory Monitoring Useful in DOAC Management?Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Comparative Investigation of Thromboelastometry and Thrombin Generation for Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants or Vitamin K Antagonists.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- More early bleeds associated with high baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study.Blood advances · 2024Observational
- Oral Anticoagulants in Women: What's the Difference? A Narrative Review.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractAlthough effective and safe, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is still associated with thrombotic complications. Whether the measurement of DOAC levels may improve treatment efficacy is an open issue. We carried out the observational, prospective, multicenter Measure and See (MAS) study. Blood was collected 15 to 30 days after starting DOAC treatment in patients with AF who were followed-up for 1 year. Plasma samples were centralized for DOAC level measurement. Patients' DOAC levels were converted into drug/dosage standardized values to allow a pooled analysis in a time-dependent, competitive-risk model. The measured values were transformed into standardized values (representing the distance of each value from the overall mean) by subtracting the DOAC-specific mean value from the original values and dividing by the standard deviation. Trough and peak DOAC levels were assessed in 1657 and 1303 patients, respectively. In total, 21 thrombotic complications were recorded during 1606 years of follow-up (incidence of 1.31% of patients per year). Of 21 thrombotic events, 17 occurred in patients whose standardized activity levels were below the mean of each DOAC (0); the incidence was the highest (4.82% of patients per year) in patients whose standardized values were in the lowest class (-1.00 or less). Early measurement of DOAC levels in patients with AF allowed us to identify most of the patients who, having low baseline DOAC levels, subsequently developed thrombotic complications. Further studies are warranted to assess whether thrombotic complications may be reduced by measuring baseline DOAC levels and modifying treatment when indicated. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03803579.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.