ArticlePloS one2024
Suboptimal capability of individual machine learning algorithms in modeling small-scale imbalanced clinical data of local hospital.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relapse prediction and individualized treatment-effect modeling in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- SurgiCut-AI: an AI-driven tool for predicting surgical site infections following ventral hernia repair using pre- and intra-operative parameters.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Ensemble learning-based online sequential pre-interference extreme learning for concept drifting and class imbalanced data streams.PloS one · 2026Article
- IFC-HFlowVAE: A self-enhancing generative framework with structural anchoring for imbalanced clinical data augmentation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Clinical Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Biomarker Signature to Predict Response to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Alone or Combined with Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Study Protocol and Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising applications in various scientific domains, including biochemical analysis research. However, the effectiveness of AI in modeling small-scale, imbalanced datasets remains an open question in such fields. This study explores the capabilities of eight basic AI algorithms, including ridge regression, logistic regression, random forest regression, and others, in modeling a small, imbalanced clinical dataset (total n = 387, class 0 = 27, class 1 = 360) related to the records of the biochemical blood tests from the patients with multiple wasp stings (MWS). Through rigorous evaluation using k-fold cross-validation and comprehensive scoring, we found that none of the models could effectively model the data. Even after fine-tuning the hyperparameters of the best-performing models, the results remained below acceptable thresholds. The study highlights the challenges of applying AI to small-scale datasets with imbalanced groups in biochemical or clinical research and emphasizes the need for novel algorithms tailored to small-scale data. The findings also call for further exploration into techniques such as transfer learning and data augmentation, and they underline the importance of understanding the minimum dataset scale required for effective AI modeling in biochemical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.