Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38394317›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Suboptimal capability of individual machine learning algorithms in modeling small-scale imbalanced clinical data of local hospital.

Gang Li, Chenbi Li, Chengli Wang, Zeheng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gang LiDepartment of ICU, 3201 Hospital, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Chenbi LiDepartment of ICU, 3201 Hospital, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Chengli WangDepartment of ICU, 3201 Hospital, Hanzhong, Shaanxi, China.
Zeheng WangData61, CSIRO, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6994-1234
Hanzhong People's Hospital · CNCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has shown promising applications in various scientific domains, including biochemical analysis research. However, the effectiveness of AI in modeling small-scale, imbalanced datasets remains an open question in such fields. This study explores the capabilities of eight basic AI algorithms, including ridge regression, logistic regression, random forest regression, and others, in modeling a small, imbalanced clinical dataset (total n = 387, class 0 = 27, class 1 = 360) related to the records of the biochemical blood tests from the patients with multiple wasp stings (MWS). Through rigorous evaluation using k-fold cross-validation and comprehensive scoring, we found that none of the models could effectively model the data. Even after fine-tuning the hyperparameters of the best-performing models, the results remained below acceptable thresholds. The study highlights the challenges of applying AI to small-scale datasets with imbalanced groups in biochemical or clinical research and emphasizes the need for novel algorithms tailored to small-scale data. The findings also call for further exploration into techniques such as transfer learning and data augmentation, and they underline the importance of understanding the minimum dataset scale required for effective AI modeling in biochemical contexts.

Indexed as

Insect Bites and StingsWaspsAlgorithmsAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID38394317
PMCPMC10890755
OpenAlexW4392093870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.