Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38394115›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Prediction of hydrological and water quality data based on granular-ball rough set and k-nearest neighbor analysis.

Limei Dong, Xinyu Zuo, Yiping Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Limei DongUpper Changjiang River Bureau of Hydrological and Water Resources Survey, Chongqing, China.
Xinyu ZuoUpper Changjiang River Bureau of Hydrological and Water Resources Survey, Chongqing, China.
Yiping XiongCollege of Computer Science and Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, China.ORCID 0009-0000-9575-9252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrological and water quality datasets usually encompass a large number of characteristic variables, but not all of these significantly influence analytical outcomes. Therefore, by wisely selecting feature variables with rich information content and removing redundant features, it not only can the analysis efficiency be improved, but the model complexity can also be simplified. This paper considers introducing the granular-ball rough set algorithm for feature variable selection and combining it with the k-nearest neighbor method and back propagation network to analyze hydrological and water quality data, thus promoting overall and fused inspection. The results of hydrological water quality data analysis show that the proposed method produces better results compared to using a standalone k-nearest neighbor regressor.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsWater QualityCluster AnalysisData AccuracyGene Regulatory Networks

Identifiers

PMID38394115
PMCPMC10889668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.