ArticleJournal of agricultural and food chemistry2024
Fermentation of Texturized Pea Protein in Combination with Proteases for Aroma Development in Meat Analogues.
Article in Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilization of Fermentation Process for the Production of Novel Plant-Based Meat Analogs: A Review of Microorganisms, Processing, and Regulations.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Probiotic Sheep Milk: Physicochemical Properties of Fermented Milk and Viability of Bacteria Under Simulated Gastrointestinal Conditions.Nutrients · 2025Article
- A review on sustainable non-thermal approaches for pea protein: Pre-treatment, extraction, modification, and applications.Food chemistry: X · 2025Article
- Umami and saltiness enhancements of textured pea proteins by combining protease- and glutaminase-catalyzed reactions.Current research in food science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The potential use of texturized pea protein in meat analogues was investigated by comparing the effects of fermentation on pea and myofibrillar pork proteins in a model system including additives, microbial starters, and proteases. Model fermentation was controlled for 15 days by a pH decrease and microbial count and free amino acid increase. Besides, volatile production and sensory properties were evaluated at the end of fermentation. Protein type affected free amino acid generation and volatile profile. Models supplemented with proteases showed an increase in amino-acid-derived compounds (branched aldehydes and alcohols) and fruity odor notes. During fermentation, protease addition significantly reduced the production of linear aldehydes (pentanal, hexanal, and octanal) in vegetal models, while pyrazine compounds were not affected. This changes in the volatile profile reduced the legume beany odor but increased the perception of toasted cereal-like notes generated by the texturization process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.