Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38393768›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Co-Production of a Flexibly Delivered Relapse Prevention Tool to Support the Self-Management of Long-Term Mental Health Conditions: Co-Design and User Testing Study.

Alyssa Milton, Ingrid Ozols A M, Tayla Cassidy, Dana Jordan, Ellie Brown, Urska Arnautovska, Jim Cook, Darren Phung, Brynmor Lloyd-Evans, Sonia Johnson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Alyssa MiltonFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4326-0123
Ingrid Ozols A Mmentalhealth@work (mh@work), Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2397-2921
Tayla CassidyOne Door Mental Health, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2752-4246
Dana JordanFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6746-6516
Ellie BrownOrygen, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1645-5443
Urska ArnautovskaFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7780-8441
Jim CookTechLab ICT, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8391-0437
Darren PhungTechLab ICT, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5881-7420
Brynmor Lloyd-EvansDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9866-788X
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2219-1384
Ian HickieBrain and Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8832-9895
Nick GlozierFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0476-9146
The University of Sydney · AUUniversity College London · GBCharles Sturt University · AUSafe Work Australia · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupported self-management interventions, which assist individuals in actively understanding and managing their own health conditions, have a robust evidence base for chronic physical illnesses, such as diabetes, but have been underused for long-term mental health conditions.

objectiveThis study aims to co-design and user test a mental health supported self-management intervention, My Personal Recovery Plan (MyPREP), that could be flexibly delivered via digital and traditional paper-based mediums.

methodsThis study adopted a participatory design, user testing, and rapid prototyping methodologies, guided by 2 frameworks: the 2021 Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions and an Australian co-production framework. Participants were aged ≥18 years, self-identified as having a lived experience of using mental health services or working in a peer support role, and possessed English proficiency. The co-design and user testing processes involved a first round with 6 participants, focusing on adapting a self-management resource used in a large-scale randomized controlled trial in the United Kingdom, followed by a second round with 4 new participants for user testing the co-designed digital version. A final round for gathering qualitative feedback from 6 peer support workers was conducted. Data analysis involved transcription, coding, and thematic interpretation as well as the calculation of usability scores using the System Usability Scale.

resultsThe key themes identified during the co-design and user testing sessions were related to (1) the need for self-management tools to be flexible and well-integrated into mental health services, (2) the importance of language and how language preferences vary among individuals, (3) the need for self-management interventions to have the option of being supported when delivered in services, and (4) the potential of digitization to allow for a greater customization of self-management tools and the development of features based on individuals' unique preferences and needs. The MyPREP paper version received a total usability score of 71, indicating C+ or good usability, whereas the digital version received a total usability score of 85.63, indicating A or excellent usability.

conclusionsThere are international calls for mental health services to promote a culture of self-management, with supported self-management interventions being routinely offered. The resulting co-designed prototype of the Australian version of the self-management intervention MyPREP provides an avenue for supporting self-management in practice in a flexible manner. Involving end users, such as consumers and peer workers, from the beginning is vital to address their need for personalized and customized interventions and their choice in how interventions are delivered. Further implementation-effectiveness piloting of MyPREP in real-world mental health service settings is a critical next step.

Indexed as

blended interventionsdigital health toolsmobile phonepeer supportself-careself-managementserious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID38393768
PMCPMC10926903
OpenAlexW4390860703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.