Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38393726›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Major Adverse Kidney Events in Pediatric Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy.

Dana Y Fuhrman, Erin K Stenson, Issa Alhamoud, Rashid Alobaidi, Gabriella Bottari, Sarah Fernandez, Francesco Guzzi, Taiki Haga, Ahmad Kaddourah, Eleonora Marinari and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Predictive Models for CKRT: (A Long) Way to Go.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

Dana Y FuhrmanUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Erin K StensonChildren's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Issa AlhamoudUniversity of Iowa Stead Family Children's Hospital, Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City.
Rashid AlobaidiUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Gabriella BottariBambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Sarah FernandezGregorio Marañón University Hospital, School of Medicine, Madrid, Spain.
Francesco GuzziSanto Stefano Hospital, Prato, Italy.
Taiki HagaOsaka City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Ahmad KaddourahSidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar.
Eleonora MarinariBambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Tahagod H MohamedNationwide Children's Hospital, The Heart Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Catherine J MorganUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Theresa MottesAnn and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Tara M NeumayrWashington University School of Medicine, St Louis Children's Hospital, St Louis, Missouri.
Nicholas J OllberdingCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Valeria RaggiBambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Zaccaria RicciMeyer Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Florence, Italy.
Emily SeeRoyal Children's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Natalja L StanskiCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Huaiyu ZangCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Emily ZanglaUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Katja M GistCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
WE-ROCK Investigators
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Minnesota System · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESHospital of Prato · ITLurie Children's Hospital · USMeyer Children's Hospital · ITNationwide Children's Hospital · USOsaka City General Hospital · JPRoyal Children's Hospital · AUSt. Louis Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital · USWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

Developing a Precision Medicine Approach to Pediatric Sepsis-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Identification of Unique Subphenotypes and Strategies for Bedside ImplementationK23GM151444 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Natalja L. Stanski · 2023 to 2026
$769k
NIGMS NIH HHS K23 GM151444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) is increasingly used in youths with critical illness, but little is known about longer-term outcomes, such as persistent kidney dysfunction, continued need for dialysis, or death. Objective: To characterize the incidence and risk factors, including liberation patterns, associated with major adverse kidney events 90 days after CKRT initiation (MAKE-90) in children, adolescents, and young adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international, multicenter cohort study was conducted among patients aged 0 to 25 years from The Worldwide Exploration of Renal Replacement Outcomes Collaborative in Kidney Disease (WE-ROCK) registry treated with CKRT for acute kidney injury or fluid overload from 2015 to 2021. Exclusion criteria were dialysis dependence, concurrent extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use, or receipt of CKRT for a different indication. Data were analyzed from May 2 to December 14, 2023. Exposure: Patient clinical characteristics and CKRT parameters were assessed. CKRT liberation was classified as successful, reinstituted, or not attempted. Successful liberation was defined as the first attempt at CKRT liberation resulting in 72 hours or more without return to dialysis within 28 days of CKRT initiation. Main Outcomes and Measures: MAKE-90, including death or persistent kidney dysfunction (dialysis dependence or ≥25% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline), were assessed. Results: Among 969 patients treated with CKRT (529 males [54.6%]; median [IQR] age, 8.8 [1.7-15.0] years), 630 patients (65.0%) developed MAKE-90. On multivariable analysis, cardiac comorbidity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.08-2.37), longer duration of intensive care unit admission before CKRT initiation (aOR for 6 days vs 1 day, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.13), and liberation pattern were associated with MAKE-90. In this analysis, patients who successfully liberated from CKRT within 28 days had lower odds of MAKE-90 compared with patients in whom liberation was attempted and failed (aOR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22-0.48) and patients without a liberation attempt (aOR, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.04). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, MAKE-90 occurred in almost two-thirds of the population and patient-level risk factors associated with MAKE-90 included cardiac comorbidity, time to CKRT initiation, and liberation patterns. These findings highlight the high incidence of adverse outcomes in this population and suggest that future prospective studies are needed to better understand liberation patterns and practices.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryRenal DialysisAdolescentChildCohort StudiesHumansKidneyMaleRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38393726
PMCPMC10891477
OpenAlexW4392096571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.