Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38393672›Full record

SynthesisClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2024

The relevance of the superior cervical ganglion for cardiac autonomic innervation in health and disease: a systematic review.

H Sophia Chen, Lieke van Roon, Yang Ge, Janine M van Gils, Jan W Schoones, Marco C DeRuiter, Katja Zeppenfeld, Monique R M Jongbloed

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

H Sophia ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Willem Einthoven Center for Cardiac Arrhythmia Research and Management, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lieke van RoonDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Yang GeDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Janine M van GilsDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jan W SchoonesDirectorate of Research Policy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marco C DeRuiterDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Katja ZeppenfeldDepartment of Cardiology, Willem Einthoven Center for Cardiac Arrhythmia Research and Management, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Monique R M JongbloedDepartment of Anatomy & Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. m.r.m.jongbloed@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9132-0418

Funding

NWO ZonMw 849200014NWO ZonMw 91719346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe heart receives cervical and thoracic sympathetic contributions. Although the stellate ganglion is considered the main contributor to cardiac sympathetic innervation, the superior cervical ganglia (SCG) is used in many experimental studies. The clinical relevance of the SCG to cardiac innervation is controversial. We investigated current morphological and functional evidence as well as controversies on the contribution of the SCG to cardiac innervation.

methodsA systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and COCHRANE Library. Included studies received a full/text review and quality appraisal.

resultsSeventy-six eligible studies performed between 1976 and 2023 were identified. In all species studied, morphological evidence of direct or indirect SCG contribution to cardiac innervation was found, but its contribution was limited. Morphologically, SCG sidedness may be relevant. There is indirect functional evidence that the SCG contributes to cardiac innervation as shown by its involvement in sympathetic overdrive reactions in cardiac disease states. A direct functional contribution was not found. Functional data on SCG sidedness was largely unavailable. Information about sex differences and pre- and postnatal differences was lacking.

conclusionCurrent literature mainly supports an indirect involvement of the SCG in cardiac innervation, via other structures and plexuses or via sympathetic overdrive in response to cardiac diseases. Morphological evidence of a direct involvement was found, but its contribution seems limited. The relevance of SCG sidedness, sex, and developmental stage in health and disease remains unclear and warrants further exploration.

Indexed as

HeartSuperior Cervical GanglionAnimalsAutonomic Nervous SystemHeart DiseasesHumansAutonomic nervous systemCardiac innervationSuperior cervical ganglionSympathetic chainSympathetic ganglia

Identifiers

PMID38393672
PMCPMC10944423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.