ArticleHNO2024
[Interactive electronic visualization formats in student teaching].
Article in HNO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the context of contact restrictions, conventional teaching is currently in need of optimization and expansion. The range of digital teaching formats in student training is very heterogeneous and their effectiveness uncertain. This study aims to investigate the extent to which an electronic ward round can be used as an alternative to the conventional ENT attendance practical course, and whether the use of electronic teaching formats has an influence on the quality of teaching. MATERIALS AND
methodsInstead of regular attendance practicals, bedside teaching took place once a week in real time as a video stream via tablet. A total of 43 students in the seventh semester (winter semester 2020/2021) were included in the prospective study. Evaluation forms were used to examine the subjective didactic value of different visualization formats for the students. Examination results from previous years were used for comparison.
resultsThe majority of students reported knowledge gain from the electronic rounds (93.02%) and that they were a good alternative to the traditional attendance clerkship (69.77%). The quality of the video and audio transmission as well as the comprehensibility of the case studies presented were consistently rated as good to very good. The students' examination results tended to be slightly worse in the test group compared to the control students of previous years.
conclusionIntegration of innovative interactive visualization options into teaching shows promising prospects as a supplement to conventional face-to-face teaching. The results of this study can contribute to the further expansion of digital teaching. Scaling up this model could be considered especially in countries with limited availability of face-to-face teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.