ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2024
The diagnostic performance of Cr/CysC for sarcopenia and its predictive value on clinical outcomes in hospitalized older patients: a prospective cohort study.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Associations between the creatinine/cystatin C ratio and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Sex differences in the association between sarcopenia index and sarcopenia: a cross-sectional study from a Chinese community-based population.European geriatric medicine · 2025Article
- Correlation of lung function and sarcopenia in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and analysis of factors influencing sarcopenia.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe utilization of the creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio (Cr/CysC) represents an innovative method for predicting sarcopenia. Our objectives encompassed the evaluation of sarcopenia diagnostic accuracy for Cr/CysC, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, the combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF, and the Ishii score, as well as an exploration of the predictive value of Cr/CysC concerning clinical outcomes within hospitalized older individuals.
methodsWe employed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated areas under the curves (AUCs) to assess the diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, we applied univariate and multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of risk factors affecting prognosis.
resultsOur study included 312 participants, comprising 167 men and 145 women, with an average age of 71 years. Among males, the AUCs for Cr/CysC, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, the combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF, and the Ishii score were 0.717 [95% CI 0.642-0.784], 0.669 (95% CI 0.592-0.739), 0.845 (95% CI 0.781-0.896), 0.882 (95% CI 0.823-0.926), and 0.938 (95% CI 0.890-0.969), respectively. In females, the AUCs for Cr/CysC, SARC-F, SARC-CalF, the combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF, and the Ishii score were 0.706 (95% CI 0.625-0.779), 0.631 (95% CI 0.547-0.710), 0.763 (95% CI 0.686-0.830), 0.789 (95% CI 0.714-0.853), and 0.898 (95% CI 0.837-0.942), respectively. After adjusting for age, sex, physical exercise, smoking, drinking, hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and cancer, sarcopenia identified by Cr/CysC (adjusted HR = 2.176, 95% CI 1.062-4.460, P = 0.034) was independently associated with poor overall survival in hospitalized older patients.
conclusionsCr/CysC has satisfactory diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenia diagnosis and predictive value for poor outcomes in hospitalized older patients. The combination of Cr/CysC and SARC-CalF may provide a more accurate screening for sarcopenia and the Ishii score may be the most accurate clinical method for detecting sarcopenia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.