ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2024
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Discontinuation in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Strategies to Optimize Success and New Directions.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Prognostic factors in chronic myeloid leukemia: at diagnosis and for treatment-free remission.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib vs. sorafenib as first-line treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Structure and Dynamics of the ABL1 Tyrosine Kinase and Its Important Role in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe discovery that patients suffering from chronic myeloid leukemia who obtain deep and long-lasting molecular responses upon treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may maintain their disease silent for many years after therapy discontinuation launched the era of treatment-free remission as a key management goal in clinical practice. The purpose of this review on treatment-free remission is to discuss clinical advances, highlight knowledge gaps, and describe areas of research. RECENT
findingsPatients in treatment-free remission are a minority, and it is believed that some may still retain a reservoir of leukemic stem cells; thus, whether they can be considered as truly cured is uncertain. Strengthening BCR::ABL1 inhibition increases deep molecular responses but is not sufficient to improve treatment-free remission, and we lack biomarkers to identify and specifically target residual cells with aggressive potential. Another level of complexity resides in the intra- and inter-patient clonal heterogeneity of minimal residual disease and characteristics of the bone marrow environment. Finding determinants of deep molecular responses achievement and elucidating varying biological mechanisms enabling either post-tyrosine kinase inhibitor chronic myeloid leukemia control or relapse may help develop innovative and safe therapies. In the light of the increasing prevalence of CML, targeting the residual leukemic stem cell pool is thought to be the key.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38393431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.