ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2024
Analysis of biopsy pathology and risk factors of lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the relationship between biopsy pathology and lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate cancer (PCa), and to identify risk factors of lymph node metastasis (LNM). PATIENTS AND
methodsPatients diagnosed with prostate cancer were respective screened between Jan 2015 and May 2022. Patients diagnosed PCa via 13-core ultrasound-guided biopsies and underwent radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection were identified. The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients were recorded. Relationships between LNM and non-LNM were analyzed using chi-square and independent samples t-test. Logistic regression model was fitted to analyze the risk factors of lymph node metastases.
resultsTwo hundreds and fifteen patients were included, sixty-seven patients had lymph node metastasis. Gleason scores in LNM group were higher than that in non-LNM group (8.5 ± 0.9 VS 7.5 ± 1.5, p < 0.001), positive biopsy in non-LNM group was significantly lower than that in LNM group (p < 0.001), Binary logistic regression analysis indicated number of positive biopsy and number of removed lymph nodes increased the risks of LNM (odds ratio, OR = 1.28, 95% confidence interval, CI = 1.16-1.42, p < 0.001; OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06-1.17, p < 0.001; respectively). Number of positive biopsy in internal gland but not external gland was significant associated with LNM (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.34-2.06, p < 0.001; OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.88-1.61, p = 0.262; respectively). The patients with lymph nodes dissection more than 13 were about four times more likely to detect lymph node metastasis than those fewer than 13 (OR = 3.92, 95% CI = 2.10-7.33, p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe risk of lymph node metastasis increased with the number of positive prostate biopsy cores, and tumors in the internal gland were more likely to cause lymph node metastasis. In addition, lymph node metastasis was more likely to be found when the number of lymph nodes dissection was greater than 13.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.