ArticleEuropean radiology2024
Utilizing fully-automated 3D organ segmentation for hepatic steatosis assessment with CT attenuation-based parameters.
Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Physics-aware imaging AI for quantitative MASLD biomarker mapping: a systematic review of deep learning and radiomics across ultrasound, CT, and MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Assessment of the Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Impact of AI in Hepatic Steatosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Advances in Artificial Intelligence-Based Liver-Related Semantic Segmentation Techniques and Applications Using CT Imaging.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- Erector spinae muscle characteristics predict 90-day survival in elderly pneumonia patients.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Smart Devices in Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease.Journal of clinical and translational hepatology · 2026Article
- A nomogram model based on CT-assessed body composition parameters for predicting postoperative recurrence in advanced gastric cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in abdominal imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Diagnosis of moderate-to-severe hepatic steatosis using deep learning-based automated attenuation measurements on contrast-enhanced CT.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional organ segmentation-derived CT attenuation parameters for assessing hepatic steatosis in chronic hepatitis B patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diagnostic of fatty liver using radiomics and deep learning models on non-contrast abdominal CT.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the clinical utility of fully-automated 3D organ segmentation in assessing hepatic steatosis on pre-contrast and post-contrast CT images using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS)-proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as reference standard. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 362 adult potential living liver donors with abdominal CT scans and MRS-PDFF. Using a deep learning-based tool, mean volumetric CT attenuation of the liver and spleen were measured on pre-contrast (liver(L)_pre and spleen(S)_pre) and post-contrast (L_post and S_post) images. Agreements between volumetric and manual region-of-interest (ROI)-based measurements were assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Diagnostic performances of volumetric parameters (L_pre, liver-minus-spleen (L-S)_pre, L_post, and L-S_post) were evaluated for detecting MRS-PDFF ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with those of ROI-based parameters.
resultsAmong the 362 subjects, 105 and 35 had hepatic steatosis with MRS-PDFF ≥ 5% and ≥ 10%, respectively. Volumetric and ROI-based measurements revealed ICCs of 0.974, 0.825, 0.992, and 0.962, with mean differences of -4.2 HU, -3.4 HU, -1.2 HU, and -7.7 HU for L_pre, S_pre, L_post, and S_post, respectively. Volumetric L_pre, L-S_pre, L_post, and L-S_post yielded areas under the ROC curve of 0.813, 0.813, 0.734, and 0.817 for MRS-PDFF ≥ 5%; and 0.901, 0.915, 0.818, and 0.868 for MRS-PDFF ≥ 10%, comparable with those of ROI-based parameters (0.735-0.818; and 0.816-0.895, Ps = 0.228-0.911).
conclusionAutomated 3D segmentation of the liver and spleen in CT scans can provide volumetric CT attenuation-based parameters to detect and grade hepatic steatosis, applicable to pre-contrast and post-contrast images. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Volumetric CT attenuation-based parameters of the liver and spleen, obtained through automated segmentation tools from pre-contrast or post-contrast CT scans, can efficiently detect and grade hepatic steatosis, making them applicable for large population data collection. KEY POINTS: • Automated organ segmentation enables the extraction of CT attenuation-based parameters for the target organ. • Volumetric liver and spleen CT attenuation-based parameters are highly accurate in hepatic steatosis assessment. • Automated CT measurements from pre- or post-contrast imaging show promise for hepatic steatosis screening in large cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.