Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38393398›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2024

Radiotherapy statements of the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference-a German expert perspective.

David Krug, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski, Sara Y Brucker, Carsten Denkert, Nina Ditsch, Peter A Fasching, Renate Haidinger, Nadia Harbeck, Jörg Heil, Jens Huober and 12 more

Abstract readConsensus StatementReview
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. De-escalation strategies in early breast cancer: implications of sentinel lymph node biopsy omission for adjuvant radiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

David KrugKlinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, Haus L, 24105, Kiel, Germany. david.krug@uksh.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8811-5416
Maggie Banys-PaluchowskiKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Campus Lübeck, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
Sara Y BruckerUniversitäts-Frauenklinik Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Carsten DenkertInstitut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany.
Nina DitschKlinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Brustzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Peter A FaschingFrauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Renate HaidingerBrustkrebs Deutschland e. V., Hohenbrunn/Munich, Germany.
Nadia HarbeckBrustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, Munich, Germany.
Jörg HeilBrustzentrum Heidelberg, Klinik St. Elisabeth, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jens HuoberBrustzentrum, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Christian JackischKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Sana-Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Offenbach, Germany.
Wolfgang JanniUniversitätsfrauenklinik Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Hans-Christian KolbergKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Marienhospital Bottrop gGmbH, Bottrop, Germany.
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group (GBG), Neu-Isenburg, Germany.
Diana LüftnerImmanuel Klinik Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany.
Marion van MackelenberghGynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Campus Kiel, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Julia C RadosaKlinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Toralf ReimerUniversitätsfrauenklinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Manfred WelslauOnkologie Aschaffenburg, Hämato-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis, Klinikum Aschaffenburg-Alzenau, Aschaffenburg, Germany.
Rachel WürstleinBrustzentrum, Frauenklinik, LMU Klinikum München, Munich, Germany.
Michael UntchKlinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, interdisziplinäres Brustzentrum, HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Wilfried BudachKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo summarize the radiotherapy-relevant statements of the 18th St. Gallen Breast Cancer Consensus Conference and interpret the findings in light of German guideline recommendations.

methodsStatements and voting results from the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference were collected and analyzed according to their relevance for the radiation oncology community. The voting results were discussed in two hybrid meetings among the authors of this manuscript on March 18 and 19, 2023, in light of the German S3 guideline and the 2023 version of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) guidelines. RESULTS AND

conclusionThere was a high level of agreement between the radiotherapy-related statements of the 18th St. Gallen International Breast Cancer Consensus Conference and the German S3 and AGO guidelines. Discrepancies include the impact of number of lymph node metastases for the indication for postmastectomy radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleGermanyHumansLymphatic MetastasisRadiation OncologyRadiotherapy, AdjuvantBreast-conserving surgeryDuctal carcinoma in situGuidelineHypofractionationRadiation oncology

Identifiers

PMID38393398
PMCPMC11111516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.