ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024
Evaluation of a treatment protocol based on conservative therapy for fragility fractures of the pelvis.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Surgical stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis shows a good age-appropriate result regardless of the surgical procedure].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn an aging society, fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) have increased significantly. However, there is no clear consensus on the timing and criteria for transitioning from conservative treatment to surgery for these fractures. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effects of our treatment protocol for FFP based on conservative treatment.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study including 74 patients with FFP at our institution between 2015 and 2021. All patients were treated conservatively for the first two weeks. During this period, only wheelchair transfer was allowed. If the patient could not walk after this period, surgery was performed. Fracture type (Rommens classification), walking ability, presence of complications after admission, presence of fracture union, and surgical treatment was investigated. Patients were divided into two groups: a stable group (type I/II) and an unstable group (type III/IV).
resultsFracture union was achieved in all patients. Thirteen patients developed complications after being admitted to our hospital; seven showed decreased walking ability, and six required surgeries. The stable and unstable groups comprised 47 and 27 patients, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups regarding the percentage of patients who developed complications or experienced decrease in walking ability. The percentage of patients who required surgery was significantly higher in the unstable group (p < 0.05).
conclusionOur FFP management protocol was effective regardless of fracture type. It is important to provide a period for careful assessment of instability, and to try to prevent fracture progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.