Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38393085›Full record

ArticleVeterinary sciences2024

Determining Hearing Thresholds in Dogs Using the Staircase Method.

Cécile Guérineau, Anna Broseghini, Miina Lõoke, Giulio Dehesh, Paolo Mongillo, Lieta Marinelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cécile GuérineauDipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2283-1302
Anna BroseghiniDipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8795-6237
Miina LõokeDipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Giulio DeheshIndependent Researcher, Via Chiesanuova 139, 35136 Padova, Italy.
Paolo MongilloDipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8599-4005
Lieta MarinelliDipartimento di Biomedicina Comparata e Alimentazione, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0609-2172
University of Padua · IT

Funding

the Italian Ministry of University and Research 2010/63/UEUniversity of Padua . BIRD229302/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing interest in performing playback experiments to understand which acoustical cues trigger specific behavioral/emotional responses in dogs. However, very limited studies have focused their attention on more basic aspects of hearing such as sensitivity, i.e., the identification of minimal intensity thresholds across different frequencies. Most previous studies relied on electrophysiological methods for audiograms for dogs, but these methods are considered less accurate than assessments based on behavioral responses. To our knowledge, only one study has established hearing thresholds using a behavioral assessment on four dogs but using a method that did not allow potential improvement throughout the sessions. In the present study, we devised an assessment procedure based on a staircase method. Implying the adaptation of the assessed intensity on the dogs' performance, this approach grants several assessments around the actual hearing threshold of the animal, thereby increasing the reliability of the result. We used such a method to determine hearing thresholds at three frequencies (0.5, 4.0, and 20.0 kHz). Five dogs were tested in each frequency. The hearing thresholds were found to be 19.5 ± 2.8 dB SPL at 0.5 kHz, 14.0 ± 4.5 dB SPL at 4.0 kHz, and 8.5 ± 12.8 dB SPL at 20.0 kHz. No improvement in performance was visible across the procedure. While the thresholds at 0.5 and 4.0 kHz were in line with the previous literature, the threshold at 20 kHz was remarkably lower than expected. Dogs' ability to produce vocalization beyond 20 kHz, potentially used in short-range communication, and the selective pressure linked to intraspecific communication in social canids are discussed as potential explanations for the sensitivity to higher frequencies.

Indexed as

auditory perceptionbehavioral testdoghearing sensitivityhearing thresholdstaircase method

Identifiers

PMID38393085
PMCPMC10892234
OpenAlexW4391470193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.